BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1030 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29538673)

  • 1. Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.
    Popescu F; Jaslow CR; Kutteh WH
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 29538673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence, causes, and impact of non-visualized pregnancy losses in a recurrent pregnancy loss population.
    Bedaiwy MA; Fayek B; Yang EC; Iews MS; Elgendi M; Abdelkareem AO; Abdellah AH; Liu YD; Jones A; Mayer U; Abdel Hafez FF
    Hum Reprod; 2023 May; 38(5):830-839. PubMed ID: 36881694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure.
    Sato T; Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozawa F; Yamamoto T; Kato T; Kurahashi H; Kuroda T; Aoyama N; Kato K; Kobayashi R; Fukuda A; Utsunomiya T; Kuwahara A; Saito H; Takeshita T; Irahara M
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 34(12):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31811307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recurrent pregnancy loss: what is the impact of consecutive versus non-consecutive losses?
    Egerup P; Kolte AM; Larsen EC; Krog M; Nielsen HS; Christiansen OB
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2428-2434. PubMed ID: 27591241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic factors identified in 1020 women with two versus three or more recurrent pregnancy losses.
    Jaslow CR; Carney JL; Kutteh WH
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Mar; 93(4):1234-43. PubMed ID: 19338986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expanding the role of chromosomal microarray analysis in the evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Eliwa J; Papas RS; Kutteh WH
    J Reprod Immunol; 2024 Feb; 161():104188. PubMed ID: 38171035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study.
    Bhatt SJ; Marchetto NM; Roy J; Morelli SS; McGovern PG
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 34027546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is chromosome testing of the second miscarriage cost saving? A decision analysis of selective versus universal recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation.
    Bernardi LA; Plunkett BA; Stephenson MD
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Jul; 98(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 22516510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss in women over the age of 35 years.
    Marquard K; Westphal LM; Milki AA; Lathi RB
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Sep; 94(4):1473-1477. PubMed ID: 19643401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-visualized pregnancy losses are prognostically important for unexplained recurrent miscarriage.
    Kolte AM; van Oppenraaij RH; Quenby S; Farquharson RG; Stephenson M; Goddijn M; Christiansen OB;
    Hum Reprod; 2014 May; 29(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 24603132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of maternal age on chromosomal anomaly rate and spectrum in recurrent miscarriage.
    Grande M; Borrell A; Garcia-Posada R; Borobio V; Muñoz M; Creus M; Soler A; Sanchez A; Balasch J
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Oct; 27(10):3109-17. PubMed ID: 22888165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproductive outcomes in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss after embryonic chromosomal microarray analysis.
    Li Y; Zhou R; Xia Z; Meng L; Huang M; Hu P; Xu Z; Wang Y
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Jan; 41(1):161-170. PubMed ID: 37874532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maternal plasma genome-wide cell-free DNA can detect fetal aneuploidy in early and recurrent pregnancy loss and can be used to direct further workup.
    Yaron Y; Pauta M; Badenas C; Soler A; Borobio V; Illanes C; Paz-Y-Miño F; Martinez-Portilla R; Borrell A
    Hum Reprod; 2020 May; 35(5):1222-1229. PubMed ID: 32386059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recurrent pregnancy loss: diagnostic workup after two or three pregnancy losses? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
    van Dijk MM; Kolte AM; Limpens J; Kirk E; Quenby S; van Wely M; Goddijn M
    Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Apr; 26(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 32103270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External validation of a frequently used prediction model for ongoing pregnancy in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Youssef A; van der Hoorn MLP; Dongen M; Visser J; Bloemenkamp K; van Lith J; van Geloven N; Lashley EELO
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 34875054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Murugappan G; Shahine LK; Perfetto CO; Hickok LR; Lathi RB
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1668-74. PubMed ID: 27278003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recurrent miscarriage in translocation carriers: no differences in clinical characteristics between couples who accept and couples who decline PGD.
    De Krom G; Arens YH; Coonen E; Van Ravenswaaij-Arts CM; Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Evers JL; Van Golde RJ; De Die-Smulders CE
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):484-9. PubMed ID: 25432924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Information-rich" reproductive outcomes in carriers of a structural chromosome rearrangement ascertained on the basis of recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Desjardins MK; Stephenson MD
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Apr; 97(4):894-903. PubMed ID: 22325687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economic analysis of chromosome testing in couples with recurrent miscarriage to prevent handicapped offspring.
    van Leeuwen M; Vansenne F; Korevaar JC; van der Veen F; Goddijn M; Mol BW
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Jul; 28(7):1737-42. PubMed ID: 23613277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic impact of using maternal plasma cell-free DNA testing to guide further workup in recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Peng S; Bhatt S; Borrell A; Yaron Y
    Prenat Diagn; 2021 Sep; 41(10):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 34002411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.