316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29542277)
1. Clinical acceptance testing and scanner comparison of ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Long Z; Tradup DJ; Song P; Stekel SF; Chen S; Glazebrook KN; Hangiandreou NJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):336-342. PubMed ID: 29542277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superficial ultrasound shear wave speed measurements in soft and hard elasticity phantoms: repeatability and reproducibility using two ultrasound systems.
Dillman JR; Chen S; Davenport MS; Zhao H; Urban MW; Song P; Watcharotone K; Carson PL
Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):376-85. PubMed ID: 25249389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability and Agreement of Shear Wave Speed Measurements in Phantoms and Human Livers Across 6 Ultrasound 2-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Systems.
Gilligan LA; Trout AT; Bennett P; Dillman JR
Invest Radiol; 2020 Apr; 55(4):191-199. PubMed ID: 31977604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-dimensional shear-wave elastography on conventional ultrasound scanners with time-aligned sequential tracking (TAST) and comb-push ultrasound shear elastography (CUSE).
Song P; Macdonald M; Behler R; Lanning J; Wang M; Urban M; Manduca A; Zhao H; Callstrom M; Alizad A; Greenleaf J; Chen S
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Feb; 62(2):290-302. PubMed ID: 25643079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra- and Inter-Observer Reproducibility of a 2-D Shear Wave Elastography Technique and the Impact of Ultrasound Experience in Achieving Reliable Data.
Moga TV; Stepan AM; Pienar C; Bende F; Popescu A; Șirli R; Dănilă M; Sporea I
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1627-1637. PubMed ID: 29801976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional vs. two-dimensional shear-wave elastography of the testes - preliminary study on a healthy collective.
Marcon J; Trottmann M; Rübenthaler J; D'Anastasi M; Stief CG; Reiser MF; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2016; 64(3):447-456. PubMed ID: 27886002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional shear wave elastography on conventional ultrasound scanners with external vibration.
Huang C; Song P; Mellema DC; Gong P; Lok UW; Tang S; Ling W; Meixner DD; Urban MW; Manduca A; Greenleaf JF; Chen S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215009. PubMed ID: 32663816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of shear wave elastography among operators, machines, and probes in an elasticity phantom.
Alrashed AI; Alfuraih AM
Ultrasonography; 2021 Jan; 40(1):158-166. PubMed ID: 32660213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluations of UltraiQ software for objective ultrasound image quality assessment using images from a commercial scanner.
Long Z; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF; Gorny KR; Hangiandreou NJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 29336119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra-Individual Comparison between 2-D Shear Wave Elastography (GE System) and Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification (Siemens System) in Grading Liver Fibrosis.
Sigrist RMS; El Kaffas A; Jeffrey RB; Rosenberg J; Willmann JK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 43(12):2774-2782. PubMed ID: 28967501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography: Variations of Liver Fibrosis Assessment as a Function of Depth, Force and Distance from Central Axis of the Transducer with a Comparison of Different Systems.
Dhyani M; Xiang F; Li Q; Chen L; Li C; Bhan AK; Anthony B; Grajo JR; Samir AE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):2209-2222. PubMed ID: 30143339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-dimensional shear-wave elastography: a new method comparable to acoustic radiation force impulse imaging?
Schellhaas B; Strobel D; Wildner D; Goertz RS; Neurath MF; Pfeifer L
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jun; 29(6):723-729. PubMed ID: 28118179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of 2-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Assessment of the Liver: A Direct Comparison With Point Shear Wave Elastography in Healthy Volunteers.
Fang C; Konstantatou E; Romanos O; Yusuf GT; Quinlan DJ; Sidhu PS
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Aug; 36(8):1563-1569. PubMed ID: 28370146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra- and inter-operator reproducibility of US point shear-wave elastography in various organs: evaluation in phantoms and healthy volunteers.
Kishimoto R; Kikuchi K; Koyama A; Kershaw J; Omatsu T; Tachibana Y; Suga M; Obata T
Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):5999-6008. PubMed ID: 31089847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability of shear wave elastography in liver fibrosis phantoms-Evaluation of five different systems.
Mulabecirovic A; Mjelle AB; Gilja OH; Vesterhus M; Havre RF
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0189671. PubMed ID: 29293527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study.
Shin HJ; Kim MJ; Kim HY; Roh YH; Lee MJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3361-7. PubMed ID: 26815368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of influencing factors of shear wave elastography of the superficial tissue: A phantom study.
Chen Q; Shi B; Zheng Y; Hu X
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():943844. PubMed ID: 36004380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of four different Shear Wave Elastography platforms according to abdominal wall thickness in liver fibrosis evaluation: a phantom study.
Lee SM; Chang W; Kang HJ; Ahn SJ; Lee JH; Lee JM
Med Ultrason; 2019 Feb; 21(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 30779827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shear wave speed measurement bias in a viscoelastic phantom across six ultrasound elastography systems: a comparative study with transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography.
Kishimoto R; Suga M; Usumura M; Iijima H; Yoshida M; Hachiya H; Shiina T; Yamakawa M; Konno K; Obata T; Yamaguchi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2022 Apr; 49(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 35061118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
