These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29542817)

  • 1. N-2 repetition leads to a cost within working memory and a benefit outside it.
    Kessler Y
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):268-277. PubMed ID: 29542817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decomposing the n-back task: An individual differences study using the reference-back paradigm.
    Rac-Lubashevsky R; Kessler Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():190-9. PubMed ID: 27425422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When flanker meets the n-back: What EEG and pupil dilation data reveal about the interplay between the two central-executive working memory functions inhibition and updating.
    Scharinger C; Soutschek A; Schubert T; Gerjets P
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Oct; 52(10):1293-304. PubMed ID: 26238380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analogous mechanisms of selection and updating in declarative and procedural working memory: experiments and a computational model.
    Oberauer K; Souza AS; Druey MD; Gade M
    Cogn Psychol; 2013 Mar; 66(2):157-211. PubMed ID: 23276689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention allocation: Relationships to general working memory or specific language processing.
    Archibald LM; Levee T; Olino T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Nov; 139():83-98. PubMed ID: 26094240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analogous selection processes in declarative and procedural working memory: N-2 list-repetition and task-repetition costs.
    Gade M; Souza AS; Druey MD; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 27517876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociating working memory updating and automatic updating: The reference-back paradigm.
    Rac-Lubashevsky R; Kessler Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):951-969. PubMed ID: 26618910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory at work: how the updating process alters the nature of working memory transfer.
    Zhang Y; Verhaeghen P; Cerella J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 22105718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.
    Meier ME; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1849-72. PubMed ID: 26120774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Declarative and procedural working memory updating processes are mutually facilitative.
    Sali AW; Egner T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1858-1871. PubMed ID: 31875313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Updating visual working memory in the change detection paradigm.
    Kessler Y; Rac-Lubashevsky R; Lichtstein C; Markus H; Simchon A; Moscovitch M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(9):18. PubMed ID: 26230980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Control of interference during working memory updating.
    Szmalec A; Verbruggen F; Vandierendonck A; Kemps E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):137-51. PubMed ID: 20731517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
    Koshino H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The fate of distractors in working memory: No evidence for their active removal.
    Dagry I; Barrouillet P
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():129-138. PubMed ID: 28886408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working memory contents revive the neglected, but suppress the inhibited.
    Han SW
    Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():116-21. PubMed ID: 26355831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of working memory capacity and interference resolution mechanisms in task switching.
    Pettigrew C; Martin RC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Dec; 69(12):2431-2451. PubMed ID: 26594895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The neural basis of updating: Distinguishing substitution processes from other concurrent processes.
    Sörqvist P; Saetrevik B
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Oct; 51(5):357-62. PubMed ID: 20338016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory's workload capacity.
    Heathcote A; Coleman JR; Eidels A; Watson JM; Houpt J; Strayer DL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Oct; 43(7):973-89. PubMed ID: 25962602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impaired memory updating associated with impaired recall of negative words in dysphoric rumination-Evidence for a removal deficit.
    Chang EP; Ecker UKH; Page AC
    Behav Res Ther; 2017 Jun; 93():22-28. PubMed ID: 28347841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.