BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29543657)

  • 1. Clinical Faceoff: Instability After THA: The Potential Role of the Bearing Surface.
    Parvizi J; Sedel L; Dunbar MJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Apr; 476(4):678-683. PubMed ID: 29543657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stability and trunnion wear potential in large-diameter metal-on-metal total hips: a finite element analysis.
    Elkins JM; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):529-42. PubMed ID: 24218160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hard-on-Hard Bearings Are Associated With Increased Noise Generation in Young Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty.
    Nam D; Barrack T; Johnson SR; Nunley RM; Barrack RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2115-22. PubMed ID: 26911973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The surgical options and clinical evidence for treatment of wear or corrosion occurring with THA or TKA.
    Engh CA; Ho H; Padgett DE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 472(12):3674-86. PubMed ID: 25024023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
    Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):300-303. PubMed ID: 27844400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
    Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes.
    Marshall DA; Pykerman K; Werle J; Lorenzetti D; Wasylak T; Noseworthy T; Dick DA; O'Connor G; Sundaram A; Heintzbergen S; Frank C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jul; 472(7):2217-30. PubMed ID: 24700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty.
    Plummer DR; Haughom BD; Della Valle CJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 45(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24267202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA?
    Chalmers BP; Pallante GD; Taunton MJ; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 29529660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What Is the Survivorship of Revision Surgery Performed for the Chronically Dislocated THA?
    Brown TS; McLaughlin RJ; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG; Trousdale RT; Sierra RJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):374-379. PubMed ID: 30794225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pearls: Clinical Application of Ranawat's Sign.
    Blumenfeld TJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jul; 475(7):1789-1790. PubMed ID: 28497375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. There Are No Differences in Short- to Mid-term Survivorship Among Total Hip-bearing Surface Options: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Wyles CC; Jimenez-Almonte JH; Murad MH; Norambuena-Morales GA; Cabanela ME; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2031-41. PubMed ID: 25516002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.
    Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?
    Pitto RP; Sedel L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2213-8. PubMed ID: 27249955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Editorial Comment: 2017 Hip Society Proceedings.
    Goodman SB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):214-215. PubMed ID: 29529649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Faceoff: Where Are We Going With Femoral Stem Fixation in THA?
    Moskal JT; Capps SG; Engh CA; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2349-2353. PubMed ID: 27020428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehensive Review of Current Constraining Devices in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Van der Merwe JM
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Jul; 26(14):479-488. PubMed ID: 29878970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No Difference in Reoperations at 2 Years Between Ceramic-on-metal and Metal-on-metal THA: A Randomized Trial.
    Engh CA; Sritulanondha S; Korczak A; Whalen TD; Naudie DD; McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):447-55. PubMed ID: 26135473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical faceoff: Ceramic-on-ceramic THA: do the advantages outweigh the limitations?
    Sedel L; Walter WL; Pitto RP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Oct; 472(10):2927-31. PubMed ID: 24818735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishing a range of motion boundary for total hip arthroplasty.
    Turley GA; Ahmed SM; Williams MA; Griffin DR
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Aug; 225(8):769-82. PubMed ID: 21922954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.