215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29543868)
1. Human and model observer performance for lesion detection in breast cone beam CT images with the FDK reconstruction.
Han M; Kim B; Baek J
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194408. PubMed ID: 29543868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of human observer performance on lesion detectability in single-slice and multislice dedicated breast cone beam CT images with breast anatomical background.
Han M; Jang H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5385-5396. PubMed ID: 30273955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A performance comparison of anthropomorphic model observers for breast cone beam CT images: A single-slice and multislice study.
Han M; Baek J
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3431-3441. PubMed ID: 31106432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of anatomical noise on the detectability of cone beam CT images with different slice direction, slice thickness, and volume glandular fraction.
Han M; Park S; Baek J
Opt Express; 2016 Aug; 24(17):18843-59. PubMed ID: 27557168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human observer performance on in-plane digital breast tomosynthesis images: Effects of reconstruction filters and data acquisition angles on signal detection.
Lee C; Han M; Baek J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229915. PubMed ID: 32163472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between human observer performance and model observer performance in differential phase contrast CT.
Li K; Garrett J; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111905. PubMed ID: 24320438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A fast forward projection using multithreads for multirays on GPUs in medical image reconstruction.
Chou CY; Chuo YY; Hung Y; Wang W
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4052-65. PubMed ID: 21859004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective assessment of low contrast detectability in computed tomography with Channelized Hotelling Observer.
Racine D; Ba AH; Ott JG; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26515665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam CT: evaluation by 2AFC tests in relation to physical performance metrics.
Tward DJ; Siewerdsen JH; Daly MJ; Richard S; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA; Paul NS
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4459-71. PubMed ID: 18072510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A convolutional neural network-based anthropomorphic model observer for signal-known-statistically and background-known-statistically detection tasks.
Han M; Baek J
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(22):225025. PubMed ID: 33032268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A data-efficient method for local noise power spectrum (NPS) estimation in FDK-reconstructed 3D cone-beam CT.
Zeng R; Torkaman M; Ning H; Zhuge Y; Miller R; Myers KJ
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1634-1647. PubMed ID: 30723944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast CT: Reproducibility of Volumetric Glandular Fraction with Advanced Image Reconstruction Methods.
Vedantham S; Tseng HW; Fu Z; Chow HS
Tomography; 2023 Nov; 9(6):2039-2051. PubMed ID: 37987346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Localization of liver lesions in abdominal CT imaging: II. Mathematical model observer performance correlates with human observer performance for localization of liver lesions in abdominal CT imaging.
Dilger SKN; Leng S; Chen B; Carter RE; Favazza CP; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Yu L
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105012. PubMed ID: 30995626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Iterative reconstruction for image enhancement and dose reduction in diagnostic cone beam CT imaging.
Matenine D; Schmittbuhl M; Bedwani S; Després P; de Guise JA
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(5):805-819. PubMed ID: 31450539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of Fourier-domain task-based detectability index in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT in relation to human observer performance.
Gang GJ; Lee J; Stayman JW; Tward DJ; Zbijewski W; Prince JL; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1754-68. PubMed ID: 21626910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of image-reconstruction algorithms for circular, cone-beam CT by Hotelling observer performance on a detection task.
Sidky EY; Pan X
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():997-9. PubMed ID: 19964255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scatter correction in cone-beam CT via a half beam blocker technique allowing simultaneous acquisition of scatter and image information.
Lee H; Xing L; Lee R; Fahimian BP
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2386-95. PubMed ID: 22559608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cascaded systems analysis of noise and detectability in dual-energy cone-beam CT.
Gang GJ; Zbijewski W; Webster Stayman J; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5145-56. PubMed ID: 22894440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A curve-filtered FDK (C-FDK) reconstruction algorithm for circular cone-beam CT.
Li L; Xing Y; Chen Z; Zhang L; Kang K
J Xray Sci Technol; 2011; 19(3):355-71. PubMed ID: 21876285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.
Chen L; Boone JM; Abbey CK; Hargreaves J; Bateni C; Lindfors KK; Yang K; Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Gazi P
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3347-58. PubMed ID: 25825980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
