643 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29544501)
1. Evaluation of EMG pattern recognition for upper limb prosthesis control: a case study in comparison with direct myoelectric control.
Resnik L; Huang HH; Winslow A; Crouch DL; Zhang F; Wolk N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):23. PubMed ID: 29544501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EMG pattern recognition compared to foot control of the DEKA Arm.
Resnik LJ; Acluche F; Borgia M; Cancio J; Latlief G; Phillips S; Sasson N
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204854. PubMed ID: 30335781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the Ability of Congenital Upper Extremity Amputees to Control a Multi-Degree of Freedom Myoelectric Prosthesis.
Kaluf B; Gart MS; Loeffler BJ; Gaston G
J Hand Surg Am; 2022 Oct; 47(10):1019.e1-1019.e9. PubMed ID: 34657765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A real-time comparison between direct control, sequential pattern recognition control and simultaneous pattern recognition control using a Fitts' law style assessment procedure.
Wurth SM; Hargrove LJ
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 May; 11():91. PubMed ID: 24886664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Outperforms Direct Control for Transhumeral Amputees with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Hargrove LJ; Miller LA; Turner K; Kuiken TA
Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13840. PubMed ID: 29062019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toward attenuating the impact of arm positions on electromyography pattern-recognition based motion classification in transradial amputees.
Geng Y; Zhou P; Li G
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Oct; 9():74. PubMed ID: 23036049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the real-time controllability of pattern recognition to conventional myoelectric control for discrete and simultaneous movements.
Young AJ; Smith LH; Rouse EJ; Hargrove LJ
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 11():5. PubMed ID: 24410948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resolving the adverse impact of mobility on myoelectric pattern recognition in upper-limb multifunctional prostheses.
Samuel OW; Li X; Geng Y; Asogbon MG; Fang P; Huang Z; Li G
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Nov; 90():76-87. PubMed ID: 28961473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. User experience of controlling the DEKA Arm with EMG pattern recognition.
Resnik LJ; Acluche F; Lieberman Klinger S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203987. PubMed ID: 30240420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pattern recognition control of multifunction myoelectric prostheses by patients with congenital transradial limb defects: a preliminary study.
Kryger M; Schultz AE; Kuiken T
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 21960053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dexterity, activity performance, disability, quality of life, and independence in upper limb Veteran prosthesis users: a normative study.
Resnik L; Borgia M; Cancio J; Heckman J; Highsmith J; Levy C; Phillips S; Webster J
Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 44(11):2470-2481. PubMed ID: 33073621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Closed-Loop Multi-Amplitude Control for Robust and Dexterous Performance of Myoelectric Prosthesis.
Markovic M; Varel M; Schweisfurth MA; Schilling AF; Dosen S
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Feb; 28(2):498-507. PubMed ID: 31841418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Protocol for site selection and movement assessment for the myoelectric control of a multi-functional upper-limb prosthesis.
Al-Timemy AH; Escudero J; Bugmann G; Outram N
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5817-20. PubMed ID: 24111061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EMG pattern recognition control of multifunctional prostheses by transradial amputees.
Li G; Kuiken TA
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6914-7. PubMed ID: 19964455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guiding the Training of Users With a Pattern Similarity Biofeedback to Improve the Performance of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition.
de Montalivet E; Bailly K; Touillet A; Martinet N; Paysant J; Jarrasse N
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Aug; 28(8):1731-1741. PubMed ID: 32746295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. User training for machine learning controlled upper limb prostheses: a serious game approach.
Kristoffersen MB; Franzke AW; Bongers RM; Wand M; Murgia A; van der Sluis CK
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Feb; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 33579326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Brief activity performance measure for upper limb amputees: BAM-ULA.
Resnik L; Borgia M; Acluche F
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 28091278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Upper Limb Prosthesis Control for High-Level Amputees via Myoelectric Recognition of Leg Gestures.
Lyons KR; Joshi SS; Joshi SS; Lyons KR
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 May; 26(5):1056-1066. PubMed ID: 29752241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Motion recognition for simultaneous control of multifunctional transradial prostheses.
Jiang N; Tian L; Fang P; Dai Y; Li G
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1603-6. PubMed ID: 24110009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards resolving the co-existing impacts of multiple dynamic factors on the performance of EMG-pattern recognition based prostheses.
Asogbon MG; Samuel OW; Geng Y; Oluwagbemi O; Ning J; Chen S; Ganesh N; Feng P; Li G
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Feb; 184():105278. PubMed ID: 31901634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
