These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29544501)
61. Towards limb position invariant myoelectric pattern recognition using time-dependent spectral features. Khushaba RN; Takruri M; Miro JV; Kodagoda S Neural Netw; 2014 Jul; 55():42-58. PubMed ID: 24721224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Context-Dependent Upper Limb Prosthesis Control for Natural and Robust Use. Amsuess S; Vujaklija I; Goebel P; Roche AD; Graimann B; Aszmann OC; Farina D IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Jul; 24(7):744-53. PubMed ID: 26173217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis. Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Bentz T; Wüstefeld D; Farina D; Dosen S J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):28. PubMed ID: 29580245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Cognitive predictors of skilled performance with an advanced upper limb multifunction prosthesis: a preliminary analysis. Hancock L; Correia S; Ahern D; Barredo J; Resnik L Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Jul; 12(5):504-511. PubMed ID: 27049235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses. Clemente F; D'Alonzo M; Controzzi M; Edin BB; Cipriani C IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Dec; 24(12):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 26584497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Can transcranial direct current stimulation enhance performance of myoelectric control for multifunctional prosthesis? Pan L; Zhang D; Duan R; Zhu X Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():3566-9. PubMed ID: 25570761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Selective classification for improved robustness of myoelectric control under nonideal conditions. Scheme EJ; Englehart KB; Hudgins BS IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1698-705. PubMed ID: 21317073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Voluntary phantom hand and finger movements in transhumerai amputees could be used to naturally control polydigital prostheses. Jarrasse N; Nicol C; Richer F; Touillet A; Martinet N; Paysant J; De Graaf JB IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1239-1245. PubMed ID: 28813991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Evaluation of a Simultaneous Myoelectric Control Strategy for a Multi-DoF Transradial Prosthesis. Piazza C; Rossi M; Catalano MG; Bicchi A; Hargrove LJ IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Oct; 28(10):2286-2295. PubMed ID: 32804650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Dynamic time warping for reducing the effect of force variation on myoelectric control of hand prostheses. Powar OS; Chemmangat K J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2019 Oct; 48():152-160. PubMed ID: 31357113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Performance of Combined Surface and Intramuscular EMG for Classification of Hand Movements. Rehman MZU; Gillani SO; Waris A; Jochumsen M; Niazi IK; Kamavuako EN Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5220-5223. PubMed ID: 30441515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Adapting myoelectric control in real-time using a virtual environment. Woodward RB; Hargrove LJ J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jan; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 30651109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand. Pasquina PF; Evangelista M; Carvalho AJ; Lockhart J; Griffin S; Nanos G; McKay P; Hansen M; Ipsen D; Vandersea J; Butkus J; Miller M; Murphy I; Hankin D J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Apr; 244():85-93. PubMed ID: 25102286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Prosthesis-guided training of pattern recognition-controlled myoelectric prosthesis. Chicoine CL; Simon AM; Hargrove LJ Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():1876-9. PubMed ID: 23366279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Pattern recognition and direct control home use of a multi-articulating hand prosthesis. Simon AM; Turner KL; Miller LA; Hargrove LJ; Kuiken TA IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():386-391. PubMed ID: 31374660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Analysis of using EMG and mechanical sensors to enhance intent recognition in powered lower limb prostheses. Young AJ; Kuiken TA; Hargrove LJ J Neural Eng; 2014 Oct; 11(5):056021. PubMed ID: 25242111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Realizing Efficient EMG-Based Prosthetic Control Strategy. Li G; Samuel OW; Lin C; Asogbon MG; Fang P; Idowu PO Adv Exp Med Biol; 2019; 1101():149-166. PubMed ID: 31729675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Myoelectric prosthesis hand grasp control following targeted muscle reinnervation in individuals with transradial amputation. Simon AM; Turner KL; Miller LA; Dumanian GA; Potter BK; Beachler MD; Hargrove LJ; Kuiken TA PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280210. PubMed ID: 36701412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Simultaneous, proportional, multi-axis prosthesis control using multichannel surface EMG. Yatsenko D; McDonnall D; Guillory KS Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():6134-7. PubMed ID: 18003415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]