210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29545058)
1. Causes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure and Strategies for Surgical Revision: Implications of Device Component Survival.
Srivastava A; Joice GA; Patel HD; Manka MG; Sopko NA; Wright EJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):887-893. PubMed ID: 29545058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction?
Bugeja S; Ivaz SL; Frost A; Andrich DE; Mundy AR
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 26384584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intentionally retained pressure-regulating balloon in artificial urinary sphincter revision.
Köhler TS; Benson A; Ost L; Wilson SK; Brant WO
J Sex Med; 2013 Oct; 10(10):2566-70. PubMed ID: 22974168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical failure rates of artificial urinary sphincter components: Is the 3.5-cm urethral cuff at higher risk?
Loh-Doyle JC; Hartman N; Nazemi A; Wayne K; Doumanian LR; Ginsberg DA; Boyd SD
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Jan; 38(1):187-192. PubMed ID: 30248180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of Pressure Regulating Balloon Exchange in Men With Post Artificial Urinary Sphincter Persistent or Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Moses RA; Keihani S; Craig JR; Basilius J; Hotaling JM; Lenherr SM; Brant WO; Myers JB
Urology; 2019 Jan; 123():252-257. PubMed ID: 30201300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of Device-related Complications After Exchange of the Pressure-regulating Balloon in Men With an Artificial Urinary Sphincter.
Loh-Doyle JC; Nazemi A; Ashrafi A; Doumanian LR; Ginsberg DA; Boyd SD
Urology; 2020 Jan; 135():154-158. PubMed ID: 31585200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Revision in Nonneurological Male Patients.
Bentellis I; El-Akri M; Cornu JN; Brierre T; Cousin T; Gaillard V; Dupuis H; Tricard T; Hermieu N; Bertrand-Leon P; Chevallier D; Bruyere F; Biardeau X; Hermieu JF; Lecoanet P; Capon G; Game X; Saussine C; Durand M; Peyronnet B
J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1248-1257. PubMed ID: 34184925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proof of concept: Exposing the myth of urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter via assessment of circumferential recovery after capsulotomy and intraoperative pressure profiling of the pressure regulating balloon.
Pearlman AM; Rasper AM; Terlecki RP
Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Jul; 59(4):275-279. PubMed ID: 29984343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The 51-60 cm H
Loh-Doyle JC; Markarian E; Boyd SD; Ginsberg D
Urology; 2024 Jan; 183():221-227. PubMed ID: 37805051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Mechanical Failures-Is it Better to Replace the Entire Device or Just the Malfunctioning Component?
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1523-1528. PubMed ID: 26493494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Indications for revision of artificial urinary sphincter and modifiable risk factors for device-related morbidity.
Anusionwu II; Wright EJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Jan; 32(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 22693077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Urethral atrophy is now a rare cause for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery in the contemporary 3.5 cm cuff era.
Bergeson RL; Yi YA; Baker RC; Ward EE; Davenport MT; Morey AF
Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Feb; 9(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 32055466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pressure Regulating Balloon Herniation: A Correctable Cause of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Malfunction.
Khouri RK; Baumgarten AS; Ortiz NM; Ward EE; Baker RC; VanDyke ME; Yi YA; Hudak SJ; Morey AF
Urology; 2020 May; 139():188-192. PubMed ID: 32057792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision Techniques After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure in Men: Results From a Multicenter Study.
Eswara JR; Chan R; Vetter JM; Lai HH; Boone TB; Brandes SB
Urology; 2015 Jul; 86(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 26142602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is Removal of the Pressure-regulating Balloon Necessary After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion?
Rozanski AT; Viers BR; Shakir NA; Pagliara TJ; Scott JM; Morey AF
Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():225-229. PubMed ID: 29155193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early Revision after Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Does Not Impair the Long-Term Treatment Success.
Sayedahmed K; Rosenhammer B; Burger M; Goßler C
Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 34289484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial urinary sphincter revision: the role of ultrasound.
Brucker BM; Demirtas A; Fong E; Kelly C; Nitti VW
Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1424-8. PubMed ID: 24295256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is Risk of Artificial Urethral Sphincter Cuff Erosion Higher in Patients with Penile Prosthesis?
Sundaram V; Cordon BH; Hofer MD; Morey AF
J Sex Med; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1432-1437. PubMed ID: 27555513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) Reactivation at the Time of Urethral Cuff Exchange is Not Associated with Increased Erosion Rate.
Rabinowitz MJ; Haney NM; Liu JL; Dani H; Cohen AJ; Wright EJ
Urology; 2021 Nov; 157():253-256. PubMed ID: 34343563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
