These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29546509)

  • 1. Robust EEG/MEG Based Functional Connectivity with the Envelope of the Imaginary Coherence: Sensor Space Analysis.
    Sanchez Bornot JM; Wong-Lin K; Ahmad AL; Prasad G
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Nov; 31(6):895-916. PubMed ID: 29546509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating functional connectivity using 2D tangential components in MEG sensor space.
    Kim MY; Kwon H; Lim S; Lee YH; Kim JW; Kim K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jan; 257():64-75. PubMed ID: 26393280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources.
    Stam CJ; Nolte G; Daffertshofer A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Nov; 28(11):1178-93. PubMed ID: 17266107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phase shift invariant imaging of coherent sources (PSIICOS) from MEG data.
    Ossadtchi A; Altukhov D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():950-971. PubMed ID: 30142449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Field Spread on Resting-State Magneto Encephalography Functional Network Analysis: A Computational Modeling Study.
    Silva Pereira S; Hindriks R; Mühlberg S; Maris E; van Ede F; Griffa A; Hagmann P; Deco G
    Brain Connect; 2017 Nov; 7(9):541-557. PubMed ID: 28875718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
    Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Looking through the windows: a study about the dependency of phase-coupling estimates on the data length.
    Basti A; Chella F; Guidotti R; Ermolova M; D'Andrea A; Stenroos M; Romani GL; Pizzella V; Marzetti L
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35147515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cartesian time--frequency approach to reveal brain interaction dynamics.
    Marzetti L; Della Penna S; Nolte G; Franciotti R; Stefanics G; Romani GL
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 19(3):147-54. PubMed ID: 17587168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of Magnetoencephalography and High-Density Electroencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity Metrics.
    Marquetand J; Vannoni S; Carboni M; Li Hegner Y; Stier C; Braun C; Focke NK
    Brain Connect; 2019 Sep; 9(7):539-553. PubMed ID: 31115272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ghost interactions in MEG/EEG source space: A note of caution on inter-areal coupling measures.
    Palva JM; Wang SH; Palva S; Zhigalov A; Monto S; Brookes MJ; Schoffelen JM; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():632-643. PubMed ID: 29477441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Residual coherence and residual envelope correlation in MEG/EEG source-space connectivity analysis.
    Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():4414-7. PubMed ID: 24110712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconstructing coherent networks from electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography with reduced contamination from volume conduction or magnetic field spread.
    Drakesmith M; El-Deredy W; Welbourne S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81553. PubMed ID: 24349088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI.
    Garcés P; Pereda E; Hernández-Tamames JA; Del-Pozo F; Maestú F; Pineda-Pardo JÁ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jan; 37(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 26503502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EEG-MEG Integration Enhances the Characterization of Functional and Effective Connectivity in the Resting State Network.
    Muthuraman M; Moliadze V; Mideksa KG; Anwar AR; Stephani U; Deuschl G; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140832. PubMed ID: 26509448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying the Test-Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity.
    Garcés P; Martín-Buro MC; Maestú F
    Brain Connect; 2016 Jul; 6(6):448-60. PubMed ID: 27212454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.