These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29546747)
1. Principles of hemodynamics for mechanical circulatory support: patho-physiological key aspects of assisted PCI. Basile E; Russo G; Leone AM Minerva Cardioangiol; 2018 Oct; 66(5):600-605. PubMed ID: 29546747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemodynamic Support Devices for Shock and High-Risk PCI: When and Which One. Vetrovec GW Curr Cardiol Rep; 2017 Aug; 19(10):100. PubMed ID: 28856523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utilization of the Impella for hemodynamic support during percutaneous intervention and cardiogenic shock: an insight. Nalluri N; Patel N; Saouma S; Anugu VR; Anugula D; Asti D; Mehta V; Kumar V; Atti V; Edla S; Grewal RK; Khan HM; Kanotra R; Maniatis G; Kandov R; Lafferty JC; Dyal M; Alfonso CE; Cohen MG Expert Rev Med Devices; 2017 Oct; 14(10):789-804. PubMed ID: 28862481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of mechanical assist during high-risk PCI and STEMI with cardiogenic shock. Cyrus T; Mathews SJ; Lasala JM Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 75 Suppl 1():S1-6. PubMed ID: 20333708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cVAD registry for percutaneous temporary hemodynamic support: A prospective registry of Impella mechanical circulatory support use in high-risk PCI, cardiogenic shock, and decompensated heart failure. Vetrovec GW; Anderson M; Schreiber T; Popma J; Lombardi W; Maini B; Moller JE; Schäfer A; Dixon SR; Hall S; Ohman EM; Mindrescu C; Moses J; O'Neill W Am Heart J; 2018 May; 199():115-121. PubMed ID: 29754648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Left-ventricular unloading by transvalvular axial flow pumping in experimental cardiogenic shock and during regional myocardial ischemia. Scholz KH; Hering JP; Schröder T; Uhlig P; Kreuzer H; Hellige G Cardiology; 1994; 84(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 8205570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Percutaneous coronary intervention with the TandemHeart™ percutaneous left ventricular assist device support: Six years of experience and outcomes. Nascimbene A; Loyalka P; Gregoric ID; Kar B Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 87(6):1101-10. PubMed ID: 26589637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in the Outcomes of High-risk Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2008-2018. Lemor A; Basir MB; Truesdell AG; Tamis-Holland JE; Alqarqaz M; Grines CL; Villablanca PA; Alaswad K; Pinto DS; O'Neill W Am J Cardiol; 2021 Oct; 156():65-71. PubMed ID: 34344515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prolonged left ventricular unloading prior to revascularization in cardiogenic shock associated with complete ventricular recovery. Mylavarapu P; Mahmud E; Patel MP Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017 Sep; 18(6S1):10-13. PubMed ID: 28122689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute Biventricular Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock. Kuchibhotla S; Esposito ML; Breton C; Pedicini R; Mullin A; O'Kelly R; Anderson M; Morris DL; Batsides G; Ramzy D; Grise M; Pham DT; Kapur NK J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29054842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Percutaneous cardiac assist devices compared with surgical hemodynamic support alternatives: cost-effectiveness in the emergent setting. Maini B; Gregory D; Scotti DJ; Buyantseva L Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):E183-92. PubMed ID: 24130115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Practical Approach to Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Interventional Perspective. Atkinson TM; Ohman EM; O'Neill WW; Rab T; Cigarroa JE; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):871-83. PubMed ID: 27151604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of acute circulatory support in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Esposito M; Bader Y; Pedicini R; Breton C; Mullin A; Kapur NK Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(5):668-674. PubMed ID: 29054200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined hemodynamic support with the Impella 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump for management of refractory cardiogenic shock. Pavlidis AN; Redwood SR; Clapp BR J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):E50-1. PubMed ID: 24791724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Aggarwal B; Aman W; Jeroudi O; Kleiman NS Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2018; 14(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 29623169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock. Windecker S Curr Opin Crit Care; 2007 Oct; 13(5):521-7. PubMed ID: 17762230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Severe hemolysis associated with use of the Impella LP 2.5 mechanical assist device. Sibbald M; Džavík V Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Nov; 80(5):840-4. PubMed ID: 22511273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]