363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29548012)
1. Intraspecific Niche Models for Ponderosa Pine (Pinus ponderosa) Suggest Potential Variability in Population-Level Response to Climate Change.
Maguire KC; Shinneman DJ; Potter KM; Hipkins VD
Syst Biol; 2018 Nov; 67(6):965-978. PubMed ID: 29548012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring Climate Niches of Ponderosa Pine (Pinus ponderosa Douglas ex Lawson) Haplotypes in the Western United States: Implications for Evolutionary History and Conservation.
Shinneman DJ; Means RE; Potter KM; Hipkins VD
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151811. PubMed ID: 26985674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pinus ponderosa: A checkered past obscured four species.
Willyard A; Gernandt DS; Potter K; Hipkins V; Marquardt P; Mahalovich MF; Langer SK; Telewski FW; Cooper B; Douglas C; Finch K; Karemera HH; Lefler J; Lea P; Wofford A
Am J Bot; 2017 Jan; 104(1):161-181. PubMed ID: 28031167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mitochondrial DNA haplotype distribution patterns in Pinus ponderosa (Pinaceae): range-wide evolutionary history and implications for conservation.
Potter KM; Hipkins VD; Mahalovich MF; Means RE
Am J Bot; 2013 Aug; 100(8):1562-79. PubMed ID: 23876453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Drought stress limits the geographic ranges of two tree species via different physiological mechanisms.
Anderegg LD; HilleRisLambers J
Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Mar; 22(3):1029-45. PubMed ID: 26663665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change.
Valladares F; Matesanz S; Guilhaumon F; Araújo MB; Balaguer L; Benito-Garzón M; Cornwell W; Gianoli E; van Kleunen M; Naya DE; Nicotra AB; Poorter H; Zavala MA
Ecol Lett; 2014 Nov; 17(11):1351-64. PubMed ID: 25205436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An integrated model of environmental effects on growth, carbohydrate balance, and mortality of Pinus ponderosa forests in the southern Rocky Mountains.
Tague CL; McDowell NG; Allen CD
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80286. PubMed ID: 24282532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ectomycorrhizal communities of ponderosa pine and lodgepole pine in the south-central Oregon pumice zone.
Garcia MO; Smith JE; Luoma DL; Jones MD
Mycorrhiza; 2016 May; 26(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 26547440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic data improves niche model discrimination and alters the direction and magnitude of climate change forecasts.
Bothwell HM; Evans LM; Hersch-Green EI; Woolbright SA; Allan GJ; Whitham TG
Ecol Appl; 2021 Apr; 31(3):e02254. PubMed ID: 33159398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photosynthetic phenological variation may promote coexistence among co-dominant tree species in a Madrean sky island mixed conifer forest.
Potts DL; Minor RL; Braun Z; Barron-Gafford GA
Tree Physiol; 2017 Sep; 37(9):1229-1238. PubMed ID: 28938055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mitochondrial haplotype distribution, seed dispersal and patterns of postglacial expansion of ponderosa pine.
Johansen AD; Latta RG
Mol Ecol; 2003 Jan; 12(1):293-8. PubMed ID: 12492897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraspecific genetic variation matters when predicting seagrass distribution under climate change.
Hu ZM; Zhang QS; Zhang J; Kass JM; Mammola S; Fresia P; Draisma SGA; Assis J; Jueterbock A; Yokota M; Zhang Z
Mol Ecol; 2021 Aug; 30(15):3840-3855. PubMed ID: 34022079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrating mechanistic and empirical model projections to assess climate impacts on tree species distributions in northwestern North America.
Case MJ; Lawler JJ
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 May; 23(5):2005-2015. PubMed ID: 27859937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic variation of piperidine alkaloids in Pinus ponderosa: a common garden study.
Gerson EA; Kelsey RG; St Clair JB
Ann Bot; 2009 Feb; 103(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 19010800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Making a stand: five centuries of population growth in colonizing populations of Pinus ponderosa.
Lesser MR; Jackson ST
Ecology; 2012 May; 93(5):1071-81. PubMed ID: 22764493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Isozyme markers associated with O(3) tolerance indicate shift in genetic structure of ponderosa and Jeffrey pine in Sequoia National Park, California.
Staszak J; Grulke NE; Marrett MJ; Prus-Glowacki W
Environ Pollut; 2007 Oct; 149(3):366-75. PubMed ID: 17698266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetically informed ecological niche models improve climate change predictions.
Ikeda DH; Max TL; Allan GJ; Lau MK; Shuster SM; Whitham TG
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Jan; 23(1):164-176. PubMed ID: 27543682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraspecific variation buffers projected climate change impacts on Pinus contorta.
Oney B; Reineking B; O'Neill G; Kreyling J
Ecol Evol; 2013 Feb; 3(2):437-49. PubMed ID: 23467191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forecasting distributional responses of limber pine to climate change at management-relevant scales in Rocky Mountain National Park.
Monahan WB; Cook T; Melton F; Connor J; Bobowski B
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83163. PubMed ID: 24391742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Climate change may restrict dryland forest regeneration in the 21st century.
Petrie MD; Bradford JB; Hubbard RM; Lauenroth WK; Andrews CM; Schlaepfer DR
Ecology; 2017 Jun; 98(6):1548-1559. PubMed ID: 28266031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]