693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29548544)
1. Effects of cemented versus press-fit primary humeral stem fixation in the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty.
Salesky MA; Grace TR; Feeley BT; Ma CB; Zhang AL
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 May; 27(5):801-807. PubMed ID: 29548544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cemented humeral stem
Uy M; Wang J; Horner NS; Bedi A; Leroux T; Alolabi B; Khan M
Bone Joint J; 2019 Sep; 101-B(9):1107-1114. PubMed ID: 31474140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term evaluation of humeral stress shielding following reverse shoulder arthroplasty using press-fit fixation compared with cemented fixation.
Denard PJ; Haidamous G; Gobezie R; Romeo AA; Lederman E
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 May; 29(5):906-912. PubMed ID: 31911215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term analysis of revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty using cemented long stems.
Werner BS; Abdelkawi AF; Boehm D; Hudek R; Plumhoff P; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Feb; 26(2):273-278. PubMed ID: 27521141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term outcomes of cemented
Werthel JD; Lonjon G; Jo S; Cofield R; Sperling JW; Elhassan BT
Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):666-673. PubMed ID: 28455477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic evaluation of short-stem press-fit total shoulder arthroplasty: short-term follow-up.
Casagrande DJ; Parks DL; Torngren T; Schrumpf MA; Harmsen SM; Norris TR; Kelly JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1163-9. PubMed ID: 26897311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic changes around humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.
Raiss P; Edwards TB; Deutsch A; Shah A; Bruckner T; Loew M; Boileau P; Walch G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(7):e54. PubMed ID: 24695931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.
Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; DeVito P; Tahal DS; Mijc D; Ameri B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Sep; 477(9):2097-2108. PubMed ID: 31107323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cement-within-cement technique in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Wagner ER; Houdek MT; Hernandez NM; Cofield RH; Sánchez-Sotelo J; Sperling JW
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1448-1453. PubMed ID: 28233712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of a shorter humeral stem in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Wagner ER; Statz JM; Houdek MT; Cofield RH; Sánchez-Sotelo J; Sperling JW
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1454-1461. PubMed ID: 28359695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value comparison of humeral component press-fit and cemented techniques in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Berglund DD; Mijic D; Law TY; Kurowicki J; Rosas S; Levy JC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Mar; 28(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30392933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are short press-fit stems comparable to standard-length cemented stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Van de Kleut ML; Yuan X; Athwal GS; Teeter MG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Mar; 31(3):580-590. PubMed ID: 34968694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimizing humeral stem fixation in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the cement-within-cement technique.
Gorman RA; Christmas KN; Simon P; Hess AV; Brewley EE; Mighell MA; Frankle MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7S):S9-S16. PubMed ID: 32360178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision for a failed reverse: a 12-year review of a lateralized implant.
Stephens BC; Simon P; Clark RE; Christmas KN; Stone GP; Lorenzetti AJ; Frankle MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 May; 25(5):e115-24. PubMed ID: 26704360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Humeral Implant in Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Keener JD; Chalmers PN; Yamaguchi K
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2017 Jun; 25(6):427-438. PubMed ID: 28459709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Press-fit vs. cemented humeral stem fixation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years.
Mazaleyrat M; Favard L; Garaud P; Boileau P; Berhouet J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jan; 30(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32838951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographic changes and clinical outcomes associated with an adjustable diaphyseal press-fit humeral stem in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Harmsen SM; Norris TR
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Sep; 26(9):1589-1597. PubMed ID: 28395945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision to Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Restores Stability for Patients With Unstable Shoulder Prostheses.
Hernandez NM; Chalmers BP; Wagner ER; Sperling JW; Cofield RH; Sanchez-Sotelo J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Nov; 475(11):2716-2722. PubMed ID: 28849539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The incidence of radiographic aseptic loosening of the humeral component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Gilot G; Alvarez-Pinzon AM; Wright TW; Flurin PH; Krill M; Routman HD; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Oct; 24(10):1555-9. PubMed ID: 25958209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conversion to Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with and without Humeral Stem Retention: The Role of a Convertible-Platform Stem.
Crosby LA; Wright TW; Yu S; Zuckerman JD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(9):736-742. PubMed ID: 28463917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
