BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

600 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29550121)

  • 1. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.
    Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss.
    Olson KM; VanRaden PM; Tooker ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5378-5383. PubMed ID: 22916944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting the effect of reference population on the accuracy of within, across, and multibreed genomic prediction.
    van den Berg I; Meuwissen THE; MacLeod IM; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3155-3174. PubMed ID: 30738664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing genomic prediction for Australian Red dairy cattle.
    van den Berg I; MacLeod IM; Reich CM; Breen EJ; Pryce JE
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6276-6298. PubMed ID: 32331891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
    Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient genomic prediction based on whole-genome sequence data using split-and-merge Bayesian variable selection.
    Calus MP; Bouwman AC; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):49. PubMed ID: 27357580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How old are quantitative trait loci and how widely do they segregate?
    Kemper KE; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD; Goddard ME
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Apr; 132(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 25823838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multibreed genome wide association can improve precision of mapping causative variants underlying milk production in dairy cattle.
    Raven LA; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():62. PubMed ID: 24456127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
    Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.
    van den Berg S; Calus MP; Meuwissen TH; Wientjes YC
    BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():146. PubMed ID: 26698836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
    Cesarani A; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5141-5152. PubMed ID: 35282922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Calus MP; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 May; 47(1):42. PubMed ID: 25951906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-population genomic prediction using a multi-task Bayesian learning model.
    Chen L; Li C; Miller S; Schenkel F
    BMC Genet; 2014 May; 15():53. PubMed ID: 24884927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.
    Steyn Y; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 97(11):4418-4427. PubMed ID: 31539424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining cow and bull reference populations to increase accuracy of genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6703-15. PubMed ID: 23891299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.