These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2955068)

  • 1. Comparison of multigroup logistic and linear discriminant ECG and VCG classification.
    Willems JL; Lesaffre E
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Apr; 20(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 2955068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the classification ability of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.
    Willems JL; Lesaffre E; Pardaens J
    Am J Cardiol; 1987 Jan; 59(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 2949574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of optimal scalar electrocardiographic, orthogonal electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic criteria for diagnosing inferior and anterior myocardial infarction.
    Hill NE; Warner RA; Mookherjee S; Smulyan H
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Aug; 54(3):274-6. PubMed ID: 6465004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy by ECG and VCG in patients with inferior and posterior myocardial infarction. A comparison with echocardiographic data.
    Loperfido F; Digaetano A; Guccione P; Desantis F; Vigna C; Laurenzi F; Solfanelli N; Ferrazza A; Pennestri F; Manzoli U
    J Electrocardiol; 1986 Jul; 19(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 2943847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination of diagnostic classifications from ECG and VCG computer interpretations.
    van Bemmel JH; Kors JA; van Herpen G
    J Electrocardiol; 1992; 25 Suppl():126-30. PubMed ID: 1297678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of population on the classification of ECG-VCG's using linear regression techniques.
    Liedtke CE; Greenberg W; Tuna N
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1977 Jan; 8(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 856738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of Patients with Myocardial Infarction. Vectorcardiographic and Electrocardiographic Analysis.
    Correa R; Arini PD; Correa LS; Valentinuzzi M; Laciar E
    Methods Inf Med; 2016 May; 55(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 27063981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative accuracy of electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic criteria for inferior myocardial infarction.
    Hurd HP; Starling MR; Crawford MH; Dlabal PW; O'Rourke RA
    Circulation; 1981 May; 63(5):1025-9. PubMed ID: 7471360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vectorcardiogram more sensitive than 12-lead ECG in the detection of inferior myocardial infarction.
    Edenbrandt L; Pahlm O; Lyttkens K; Albrechtsson U
    Clin Physiol; 1990 Nov; 10(6):551-9. PubMed ID: 2083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrocardiographic poor R wave progression. I: correlation with the Frank vectorcardiogram.
    Zema MJ; Kligfield P
    J Electrocardiol; 1979 Jan; 12(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 154543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic vectorcardiography for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction compared with 12-lead electrocardiogram. BIOMACS Study Group.
    Gustafsson G; Dellborg M; Lindahl B; Wallentin L
    Coron Artery Dis; 1996 Dec; 7(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 9116929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of discrepancies between VCG and ECG interpretation of anterior wall myocardial infarction.
    Yamauchi K; Segal M; Tatematsu H; Simonson E
    J Electrocardiol; 1977 Apr; 10(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 858977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiation of posterior myocardial infarction from right ventricular hypertrophy and normal anterior loop by echocardiography.
    Kramer NE; Chawla KK; Patel R; Khan M; Mayer T; Towne WD
    Circulation; 1978 Dec; 58(6):1057-64. PubMed ID: 152167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of first acute Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction by multivariate analysis of body surface potential maps.
    Kornreich F; Montague TJ; Rautaharju PM
    Circulation; 1991 Dec; 84(6):2442-53. PubMed ID: 1835677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved ECG interpretation using synthesized VCG for the diagnosis of inferior myocardial infarction.
    Edenbrandt L; Pahlm O; Lyttkens K; Albrechtsson U
    J Electrocardiol; 1990 Jul; 23(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 2384726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic ECG classification based on neural networks.
    Bortolan G; Willems JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1993; 26 Suppl():75-9. PubMed ID: 8189152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relation of left ventricular contractile patterns in coronary artery disease to the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.
    Hilsenrath J; Tabrah F; Hamby RI; Hoffman I
    J Electrocardiol; 1975; 8(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 1176843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram for the diagnosis of left atrial enlargement.
    Benchimol A; Reich F; Desser KB
    J Electrocardiol; 1976; 9(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 133196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrocardiographic tall R waves in the right precordial leads. Comparison of recently proposed ECG and VCG criteria for distinguishing posterolateral myocardial infarction from prominent anterior forces in normal subjects.
    Zema MJ
    J Electrocardiol; 1990 Apr; 23(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 2341816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. XYZ data interpreted by a 12-lead computer program using the derived electrocardiogram.
    Dower GE; Machado HB
    J Electrocardiol; 1979 Jul; 12(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 89179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.