BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29550693)

  • 1. Automatic and controlled attentional orienting in the elderly: A dual-process view of the positivity effect.
    Gronchi G; Righi S; Pierguidi L; Giovannelli F; Murasecco I; Viggiano MP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():229-234. PubMed ID: 29550693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic and controlled attentional orienting toward emotional faces in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Righi S; Gronchi G; Ramat S; Gavazzi G; Cecchi F; Viggiano MP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2023 Apr; 23(2):371-382. PubMed ID: 36759426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Searching for emotion: A top-down set governs attentional orienting to facial expressions.
    Delchau HL; Christensen BK; Lipp OV; O'Kearney R; Bandara KH; Tan N; Yabuki H; Goodhew SC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103024. PubMed ID: 32044527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orienting and maintenance of attention to threatening facial expressions in anxiety--an eye movement study.
    Holas P; Krejtz I; Cypryanska M; Nezlek JB
    Psychiatry Res; 2014 Dec; 220(1-2):362-9. PubMed ID: 25107319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of automatic and controlled processes in the positivity effect for older adults.
    Panebianco M; Caprì T; Panebianco M; Fabio RA
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2022 Apr; 34(4):905-911. PubMed ID: 34704202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Different stages in attentional processing of facial expressions of pain: a dot-probe task modification.
    Baum C; Schneider R; Keogh E; Lautenbacher S
    J Pain; 2013 Mar; 14(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 23294996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces.
    Pourtois G; Grandjean D; Sander D; Vuilleumier P
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Jun; 14(6):619-33. PubMed ID: 15054077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe paradigm: it depends on which task is used.
    Wentura D; Messeh L; Wirth BE
    Cogn Emot; 2024 Mar; 38(2):217-231. PubMed ID: 37987765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrocortical evidence for the time course processes of attentional bias toward infant faces.
    Li B; Li X; Xu M; Diao L; Zhang D
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Mar; 696():74-78. PubMed ID: 30562545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related differences in attentional bias for emotional faces.
    Tomaszczyk JC; Fernandes MA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2014; 21(5):544-59. PubMed ID: 24063687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Saccadic latency is modulated by emotional content of spatially filtered face stimuli.
    Bannerman RL; Hibbard PB; Chalmers K; Sahraie A
    Emotion; 2012 Dec; 12(6):1384-92. PubMed ID: 22775132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early detection and avoidance of threatening faces during passive viewing.
    Becker MW; Detweiler-Bedell B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1257-64. PubMed ID: 19283559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial expression movement enhances the measurement of temporal dynamics of attentional bias in the dot-probe task.
    Caudek C; Ceccarini F; Sica C
    Behav Res Ther; 2017 Aug; 95():58-70. PubMed ID: 28544892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional Bias towards Positive Emotion Predicts Stress Resilience.
    Thoern HA; Grueschow M; Ehlert U; Ruff CC; Kleim B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0148368. PubMed ID: 27008475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age invariance in rapid facial affective reactions to emotionally valenced stimuli.
    Nangle MR; Bailey PE; Henry JD; Khlentzos GS; Varcin KJ; Whitton AE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1687-1697. PubMed ID: 28644071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional allocation to task-irrelevant fearful faces is not automatic: experimental evidence for the conditional hypothesis of emotional selection.
    Victeur Q; Huguet P; Silvert L
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Mar; 34(2):288-301. PubMed ID: 31130091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotional faces capture spatial attention in 5-year-old children.
    Elam KK; Carlson JM; Dilalla LF; Reinke KS
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Dec; 8(4):754-67. PubMed ID: 22947832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential effects of object-based attention on evoked potentials to fearful and disgusted faces.
    Santos IM; Iglesias J; Olivares EI; Young AW
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1468-79. PubMed ID: 18295286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task.
    Wirth BE; Wentura D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2463-2481. PubMed ID: 32236834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces is contingent on implicit attentional settings.
    Glickman M; Lamy D
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):303-314. PubMed ID: 28281398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.