These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29550693)

  • 21. Selective attention to fearful faces during pregnancy.
    Roos A; Lochner C; Kidd M; van Honk J; Vythilingum B; Stein DJ
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2012 Apr; 37(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 22154947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional bias to emotional stimuli is altered during moderate- but not high-intensity exercise.
    Tian Q; Smith JC
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1415-24. PubMed ID: 21707164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Empathy costs: Negative emotional bias in high empathisers.
    Chikovani G; Babuadze L; Iashvili N; Gvalia T; Surguladze S
    Psychiatry Res; 2015 Sep; 229(1-2):340-6. PubMed ID: 26235473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. "Rare" emotive faces and attentional orienting.
    Kuhn G; Pickering A; Cole GG
    Emotion; 2016 Feb; 16(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26322568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Double attention bias for positive and negative emotional faces in clinical depression: evidence from an eye-tracking study.
    Duque A; Vázquez C
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2015 Mar; 46():107-14. PubMed ID: 25305417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neurophysiological mechanisms in the emotional modulation of attention: the interplay between threat sensitivity and attentional control.
    Dennis TA; Chen CC
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Sep; 76(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 17582673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Low self-esteem elicits greater mobilization of attentional resources toward emotional stimuli.
    Li H; Yang J
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Aug; 548():286-90. PubMed ID: 23769724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings.
    Barratt D; Bundesen C
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(7):1223-37. PubMed ID: 22416914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selective attention towards painful faces among chronic pain patients: evidence from a modified version of the dot-probe.
    Khatibi A; Dehghani M; Sharpe L; Asmundson GJ; Pouretemad H
    Pain; 2009 Mar; 142(1-2):42-7. PubMed ID: 19201094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Threat sensitivity as assessed by automatic amygdala response to fearful faces predicts speed of visual search for facial expression.
    Ohrmann P; Rauch AV; Bauer J; Kugel H; Arolt V; Heindel W; Suslow T
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 183(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 17607567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fearful faces influence attentional control processes in anxious youth and adults.
    Ladouceur CD; Silk JS; Dahl RE; Ostapenko L; Kronhaus DM; Phillips ML
    Emotion; 2009 Dec; 9(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 20001128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional bias towards emotional facial expressions in survivors of dating violence.
    Lee JH; Lee JH
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(6):1127-36. PubMed ID: 24344766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of varying contextual demands on age-related positive gaze preferences.
    Noh SR; Isaacowitz DM
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Jun; 30(2):356-68. PubMed ID: 26030774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attentional bias during emotional processing: evidence from an emotional flanker task using IAPS.
    Parra MA; Sánchez MG; Valencia S; Trujillo N
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):275-285. PubMed ID: 28288533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When faces signal danger: event-related potentials to emotional facial expressions in animal phobics.
    Sarlo M; Munafò M
    Neuropsychobiology; 2010; 62(4):235-44. PubMed ID: 20714173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Human gender differences in an emotional visual oddball task: an event-related potentials study.
    Campanella S; Rossignol M; Mejias S; Joassin F; Maurage P; Debatisse D; Bruyer R; Crommelinck M; Guérit JM
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Aug; 367(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 15308288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attention orienting and inhibitory control across the different mood states in bipolar disorder: an emotional antisaccade task.
    García-Blanco AC; Perea M; Salmerón L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Dec; 94(3):556-61. PubMed ID: 24161800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attentional biases and memory for emotional stimuli in men and male rhesus monkeys.
    Lacreuse A; Schatz K; Strazzullo S; King HM; Ready R
    Anim Cogn; 2013 Nov; 16(6):861-71. PubMed ID: 23463380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is there an age-related positivity effect in visual attention? A comparison of two methodologies.
    Isaacowitz DM; Wadlinger HA; Goren D; Wilson HR
    Emotion; 2006 Aug; 6(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 16938091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attending to emotional expressions: no evidence for automatic capture in the dot-probe task.
    Puls S; Rothermund K
    Cogn Emot; 2018 May; 32(3):450-463. PubMed ID: 28425838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.