These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29551374)

  • 1. Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians.
    Nimbalkar S; Oh YY; Mok RY; Tioh JY; Yew KJ; Patil PG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 29551374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types.
    Pithon MM; Mata KR; Rocha KS; Costa Bdo N; Neves F; Barbosa GC; Coqueiro Rda S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 25466472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types.
    Mollabashi V; Abolvardi M; Akhlaghian M; Ghaffari MI
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(3):305-312. PubMed ID: 30328309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics.
    Moore T; Southard KA; Casko JS; Qian F; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):208-13; quiz 261. PubMed ID: 15750540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals.
    Zange SE; Ramos AL; Cuoghi OA; de Mendonça MR; Suguino R
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 20936959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of smile attractiveness among laypeople and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor space, as it is defined by the eyes. An innovated technique.
    Ntovas P; Karkazi F; Özbilen EÖ; Flavio A; Ladia O; Papazoglou E; Yilmaz HN; Coachman C
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Mar; 35(2):345-351. PubMed ID: 36628925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the effect of buccal corridor size on smile attractiveness.
    Oshagh M; Zarif NH; Bahramnia F
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2010; 5(4):370-80. PubMed ID: 21069108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of the buccal corridor and tooth display on smile attractiveness.
    Niaki EA; Arab S; Shamshiri A; Imani MM
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 26999893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Smile characterization by U.S. white, U.S. Asian Indian, and Indian populations.
    Sharma N; Rosenstiel SF; Fields HW; Beck FM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 May; 107(5):327-35. PubMed ID: 22546311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index.
    Krishnan V; Daniel ST; Lazar D; Asok A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 18405815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the influence of dental and facial aesthetics in determining overall attractiveness.
    Prasad KN; Sabrish S; Mathew S; Shivamurthy PG; Pattabiraman V; Sagarkar R
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):684-697. PubMed ID: 30385289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of buccal corridor in smile esthetics and its correlation with underlying skeletal and dental structures.
    Tikku T; Khanna R; Maurya RP; Ahmad N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 22945708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness.
    Chang CA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Springer NC; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel S; Christensen JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e171-80. PubMed ID: 21967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Smile Attractiveness: Differences among the Perceptions of Dental Professionals and Laypersons.
    Öz AA; Akdeniz BS; Canlı E; Çelik S
    Turk J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 30(2):50-55. PubMed ID: 30112492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese and Korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients.
    Ioi H; Kang S; Shimomura T; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS; Takahashi I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 22999668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics.
    Havens DC; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Mar; 80(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 19905858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics.
    Batwa W
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():3562916. PubMed ID: 30112381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptions of orthodontists, laypersons, and patients regarding buccal corridors and facial types.
    Huang Y; Xu Y; Liu F; Fan J; Li M; Lei Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jan; 161(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 34452789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The acceptability of variations in smile arc and buccal corridor space.
    Parekh S; Fields HW; Beck FM; Rosenstiel SF
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Feb; 10(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17284243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.