114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29552780)
21. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A patient-specific quality assurance study on absolute dose verification using ionization chambers of different volumes in RapidArc treatments.
Syam Kumar SA; Sukumar P; Sriram P; Rajasekaran D; Aketi S; Vivekanandan N
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 22626968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Implementing and evaluating a high-resolution diode array for patient-specific quality assurance of robotic brain stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy.
Xu Q; Huynh K; Nie W; Rose MS; Chawla AK; Choe KS; Kanani S; Kubicek GJ; Fan J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 May; 23(5):e13569. PubMed ID: 35278033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characterization and use of a 2D-array of ion chambers for brachytherapy dosimetric quality assurance.
Yewondwossen M
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 22189031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Compass model-based quality assurance for stereotactic VMAT treatment plans.
Valve A; Keyriläinen J; Kulmala J
Phys Med; 2017 Dec; 44():42-50. PubMed ID: 29254590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3DVH software estimates of dose to virtual ion chamber and film in composite IMRT QA.
Olch AJ
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 22225277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dosimetric and delivery efficiency investigation for treating hepatic lesions with a MLC-equipped robotic radiosurgery-radiotherapy combined system.
Jin L; Price RA; Wang L; Meyer J; Fan JJ; Ma CM
Med Phys; 2016 Feb; 43(2):727-33. PubMed ID: 26843236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Verification of dose profiles generated by the convolution algorithm of the gamma knife
Chung HT; Park JH; Chun KJ
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4880-4889. PubMed ID: 28513854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Treatment verification in the presence of inhomogeneities using EPID-based three-dimensional dose reconstruction.
van Elmpt WJ; Nijsten SM; Dekker AL; Mijnheer BJ; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2816-26. PubMed ID: 17821989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 3D dose reconstruction of pretreatment verification plans using multiple 2D planes from the OCTAVIUS/Seven29 phantom array.
Calvo O; Stathakis S; Gutiérrez AN; Esquivel C; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 11(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 22181333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. On the use of a convolution-superposition algorithm for plan checking in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Hardcastle N; Oborn BM; Haworth A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):99-110. PubMed ID: 27685114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical usefulness of MLCs in robotic radiosurgery systems for prostate SBRT.
Tomida M; Kamomae T; Suzuki J; Ohashi Y; Itoh Y; Oguchi H; Okuda T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):124-133. PubMed ID: 28691256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A novel method for monitoring the constancy of beam path accuracy in CyberKnife.
Yang B; Wong WKR; Lam WW; Geng H; Kong CW; Cheung KY; Yu SK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 May; 20(5):109-119. PubMed ID: 31004395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dosimetric verification of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer treatment plans using flattening filter-free beams.
Zhang J; Wu VW; Lu J; Hong D; Lin Z
Tumori; 2015; 101(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 26108236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans.
Swinnen AC; Öllers MC; Roijen E; Nijsten SM; Verhaegen F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):186-195. PubMed ID: 28291941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of smoothing algorithms in Monte Carlo dose calculations of cyberknife treatment plans: a lung phantom study.
Sudahar H; Gopalakrishna Kurup PG; Murali V; Velmurugan J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2012; 8(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 23174716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Geometric inaccuracy and co-registration errors for CT, DynaCT and MRI images used in robotic stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning.
Aldosary G; Szanto J; Holmes O; Lavigne B; Althobaity W; Sheikh A; Foottit C; Vandervoort E
Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():212-222. PubMed ID: 31918373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improvement of off-axis SABR plan verification results by using adapted dose reconstruction algorithms for the Octavius 4D system.
Jeevanandam P; Agnew CE; Irvine DM; McGarry CK
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1738-1747. PubMed ID: 29431850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
