These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29553471)
21. Factors affecting contraceptive use in Pakistan. Mahmood N; Ringheim K Pak Dev Rev; 1996; 35(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 12292564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sex preference for children and its implications for fertility in rural Bangladesh. Bairagi R; Langsten RL Stud Fam Plann; 1986; 17(6 Pt 1):302-7. PubMed ID: 3798493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sex preference and the value of sons and daughters in Nepal. Karki YB Stud Fam Plann; 1988; 19(3):169-78. PubMed ID: 3406965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does son preference matter? Ali SM J Biosoc Sci; 1989 Oct; 21(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 2808467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Gender preference in Goa. Harikumar P; Ferreira A; Dixit SB Indian J Matern Child Health; 1990; 1(4):146-8. PubMed ID: 12346032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Infant-child mortality and son preference as factors influencing fertility in Pakistan. Rukanuddin AR Pak Dev Rev; 1982; 21(4):297-328. PubMed ID: 12264866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An attempt to measure female status in Pakistan and its impact on reproductive behaviour. Manzoor K Pak Dev Rev; 1993; 32(4 Pt 2):917-27. PubMed ID: 12346816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of son preference in reproductive behaviour in Pakistan. Hussain R; Fikree FF; Berendes HW Bull World Health Organ; 2000; 78(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 10812738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Consistency and predictive ability of fertility preference indicators: longitudinal evidence from rural India. Roy TK; Sinha RK; Koenig M; Mohanty SK; Patel SK Int Fam Plan Perspect; 2008 Sep; 34(3):138-45. PubMed ID: 18957356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Using a mixture model to detect son preference in Vietnam. Haughton D; Haughton J J Biosoc Sci; 1996 Jul; 28(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 8698715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fertility Limiting Intention and Contraceptive Use among Currently Married Men in Nepal: Evidence from Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Paudel YR; Acharya K Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():5970705. PubMed ID: 30671463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inconsistencies in the relationship between contraceptive use and fertility in Bangladesh. Saha UR; Bairagi R Int Fam Plan Perspect; 2007 Mar; 33(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 17462986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Daughter preference and contraceptive-use in matrilineal tribal societies in Meghalaya, India. Narzary PK; Sharma SM J Health Popul Nutr; 2013 Jun; 31(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 23930347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Son Preference, Fertility Decline, and the Nonmissing Girls of Turkey. Altindag O Demography; 2016 Apr; 53(2):541-66. PubMed ID: 26931324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How female education affects reproductive behavior in urban Pakistan. Sathar ZA; Mason KO Asian Pac Popul Forum; 1993; 6(4):93-103. PubMed ID: 12318565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An index of gender preference. Ramakumar R Janasamkhya; 1988 Jun; 6(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 12315561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Alternate scenarios for population control in Pakistan: the issue of contraceptive method mix. Ahmed T; Ali SM Pak Dev Rev; 1992; 31(4 Pt 2):1281-92. PubMed ID: 12286742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Correlates of fertility behaviour in Pakistan. Yusuf F; Rukanuddin AR Biol Soc; 1989 Jun; 6(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 12282412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Family planning programs and birth control in the third world]. Wohlschlagl H Demogr Inf; 1991; ():17-34, 153. PubMed ID: 12343122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]