These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29554035)

  • 1. Speech Recognition Abilities in Normal-Hearing Children 4 to 12 Years of Age in Stationary and Interrupted Noise.
    Koopmans WJA; Goverts ST; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 29554035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners.
    Smits C; Watson CS; Kidd GR; Moore DR; Goverts ST
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 26940045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech Recognition in Noise Using Binaural Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-Noise in Children: Maturation and Self-Test Validity.
    Wolmarans J; De Sousa KC; Frisby C; Mahomed-Asmail F; Smits C; Moore DR; Swanepoel W
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 May; 32(5):315-323. PubMed ID: 34375996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sentence Recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble.
    Vermiglio AJ; Herring CC; Heeke P; Post CE; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30461388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
    George EL; Festen JM; Goverts ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing speech recognition abilities with digits in noise in cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Kaandorp MW; Smits C; Merkus P; Goverts ST; Festen JM
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 25156097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults.
    Wróblewski M; Lewis DE; Valente DL; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 22732772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-noise Testing as a Hearing Screening and Triage Tool to Classify Type of Hearing Loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):1037-1048. PubMed ID: 34799493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test for Children.
    Myhrum M; Tvete OE; Heldahl MG; Moen I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 26462169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity of the antiphasic digits-in-noise test to simulated unilateral and bilateral conductive hearing loss.
    Polspoel S; Moore DR; Swanepoel W; Kramer SE; Smits C
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Nov; 62(11):1022-1030. PubMed ID: 36121040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Assessment of Functional Hearing Deficits: Speech-in-Noise Performance.
    Phatak SA; Brungart DS; Zion DJ; Grant KW
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 30134353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Feasibility and Reliability of a Digits-in-Noise Test in the Clinical Follow-Up of Children With Mild to Profound Hearing Loss.
    Vroegop J; Rodenburg-Vlot M; Goedegebure A; Doorduin A; Homans N; van der Schroeff M
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):973-981. PubMed ID: 33577216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.
    De Sousa KC; Swanepoel W; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):442-450. PubMed ID: 31425362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental effects and spatial hearing in young children with normal-hearing sensitivity.
    Schafer EC; Beeler S; Ramos H; Morais M; Monzingo J; Algier K
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):e32-43. PubMed ID: 22688920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a Smartphone-Based Digits-in-Noise Test in Korean: a Hearing Screening Tool for Speech Perception in Noise.
    Han JH; Yi DW; Lee J; Chang WD; Lee HJ
    J Korean Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(21):e163. PubMed ID: 32476302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.