434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29554090)
21. Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Y; Kong Q; Wei H; Wang Y
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253143. PubMed ID: 34197466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomies for early-stage cervical cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Hwang JH; Kim B
J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Jan; 35(1):e9. PubMed ID: 37857564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficacy and safety of robotic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis.
Dai Z; Qin F; Yang Y; Liang W; Wang X
Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1303165. PubMed ID: 38812787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-centre experience from India.
Sekhon R; Naithani A; Makkar P; R P; Sharma P; Rawal S; Goyal Y; Mitra S; Sharma A; Mehta A
J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):935-941. PubMed ID: 34709536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Analysis of abdominal vs. robotic radical hysterectomies for patients with cervical cancer: a Bulgarian experience.
Gorchev GA; Tomov ST; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova N; Tomova VD; Ahmad S
J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):339-352. PubMed ID: 33913085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 207(3):195.e1-8. PubMed ID: 22939724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Piao X; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Chun M; Ryu HS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 26554751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Right hemicolectomy: a network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, total laparoscopic, and robotic approach.
Rausa E; Kelly ME; Asti E; Aiolfi A; Bonitta G; Bonavina L
Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr; 33(4):1020-1032. PubMed ID: 30456506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Role of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.
Park JY; Kim D; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):825-833. PubMed ID: 27503491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between different surgical approaches for overweight or obese cervical cancer patients.
Chen W; Wang R; Wu J; Wu Y; Xiao L
J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):107. PubMed ID: 38436785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy After Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study.
Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Fagotti A; Nero C; Costantini B; Lucidi A; Cicero C; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 27666513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 108(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 23737035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ["Learning curve" robotic radical hysterectomy compared to standardized laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal and open radical hysterectomy].
Pilka R; Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Neubert D
Ceska Gynekol; 2013 Jan; 78(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 23607379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study.
Nam JH; Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT
Ann Oncol; 2012 Apr; 23(4):903-11. PubMed ID: 21841155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.
Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Hertel H; Klapdor R; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Aug; 306(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 34625835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
