214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29554893)
1. Evaluation of the effects of different sand particles that used in dental implant roughened for osseointegration.
Yurttutan ME; Keskin A
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Mar; 18(1):47. PubMed ID: 29554893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical and Histologic Evaluation of Osseointegration of Titanium Dental Implants Modified by Various Combinations of Sandblasting, Acid-Etching, Hydroxyapatite, and Hyaluronic Acid Coating Techniques.
Yurttutan E; Dereci Ö; Karagöz MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 May, Jun; 38(3):583-590. PubMed ID: 37279232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thermal oxidation and hydrofluoric acid treatment on the sandblasted implant surface: A histologic histomorphometric and biomechanical study.
Qamheya AHA; Arısan V; Mutlu Z; Karabaglı M; Soluk Tekkeşin M; Kara K; Erol A; Ersanlı S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):741-755. PubMed ID: 29876965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of local cancellous bone amelioration by poly-L-DL-lactide copolymers to improve primary stability of dental implants: a biomechanical study in sheep.
Stübinger S; Waser J; Hefti T; Drechsler A; Sidler M; Klein K; von Rechenberg B; Schlottig F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):572-80. PubMed ID: 24989873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of osseointegration on various implant surfaces after bacterial contamination and cleaning: a rabbit study.
Yuan K; Chan YJ; Kung KC; Lee TM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 24451851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Residual aluminum oxide on the surface of titanium implants has no effect on osseointegration.
Piattelli A; Degidi M; Paolantonio M; Mangano C; Scarano A
Biomaterials; 2003 Oct; 24(22):4081-9. PubMed ID: 12834604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative evaluation between aluminium and titanium dioxide microparticles for blasting the surface titanium dental implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Gehrke SA; Ramírez-Fernandez MP; Granero Marín JM; Barbosa Salles M; Del Fabbro M; Calvo Guirado JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):802-807. PubMed ID: 27663612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two dental implant surface modifications on implants with same macrodesign: an experimental study in the pelvic sheep model.
Ernst S; Stübinger S; Schüpbach P; Sidler M; Klein K; Ferguson SJ; von Rechenberg B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug; 26(8):898-908. PubMed ID: 24954017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immediate loading of dental implants supporting fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible: a randomized controlled split-mouth study--machined versus titanium oxide implant surface.
Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Scapoli C; Scotti R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17340895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical stability of immediately loaded implants with various surfaces and designs: a pilot study in dogs.
Neugebauer J; Weinländer M; Lekovic V; von Berg KH; Zoeller JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 20162113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive Biomechanical Effects of Titanium Oxide for Sandblasting Implant Surface as an Alternative to Aluminium Oxide.
Gehrke SA; Taschieri S; Del Fabbro M; Coelho PG
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Oct; 41(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 24001048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of a Hydrophilic Dental Implant Surface on Osseointegration: Biomechanical Results in Rabbit.
Jinno Y; Stocchero M; Galli S; Toia M; Becktor JP
J Oral Implantol; 2021 Apr; 47(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 32663272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative in vivo study of alloy titanium implants with two different surfaces: biomechanical and SEM analysis.
Souza FÁ; Furtado TSM; Dayube URC; Melo WM; Nishioka RS; Poli PP; Maiorana C; de Carvalho PSP
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4383-4397. PubMed ID: 30972600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osseointegration of titanium implants with SLAffinity treatment: a histological and biomechanical study in miniature pigs.
Ou KL; Hsu HJ; Yang TS; Lin YH; Chen CS; Peng PW
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1515-24. PubMed ID: 26507647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Rough Surfaces: A Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in an Adult Minipig Model.
Fabbro MD; Taschieri S; Canciani E; Addis A; Musto F; Weinstein R; Dellavia C
Implant Dent; 2017 Jun; 26(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 28234707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nontraumatic Implant Explantation: A Biomechanical and Biological Analysis in Sheep Tibia.
Anitua E; Murias-Freijo A; Piñas L; Tejero R; Prado R; Orive G
J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 25536339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
