1454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29554948)
21. rpoB, a promising marker for analyzing the diversity of bacterial communities by amplicon sequencing.
Ogier JC; Pagès S; Galan M; Barret M; Gaudriault S
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):171. PubMed ID: 31357928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Large-scale benchmarking reveals false discoveries and count transformation sensitivity in 16S rRNA gene amplicon data analysis methods used in microbiome studies.
Thorsen J; Brejnrod A; Mortensen M; Rasmussen MA; Stokholm J; Al-Soud WA; Sørensen S; Bisgaard H; Waage J
Microbiome; 2016 Nov; 4(1):62. PubMed ID: 27884206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improved pipeline for reducing erroneous identification by 16S rRNA sequences using the Illumina MiSeq platform.
Jeon YS; Park SC; Lim J; Chun J; Kim BS
J Microbiol; 2015 Jan; 53(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 25557481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform.
Fouhy F; Clooney AG; Stanton C; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 27342980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of PacBio sequencing for full-length bacterial 16S rRNA gene classification.
Wagner J; Coupland P; Browne HP; Lawley TD; Francis SC; Parkhill J
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):274. PubMed ID: 27842515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comprehensive evaluation of the sl1p pipeline for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
Whelan FJ; Surette MG
Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):100. PubMed ID: 28807046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. High throughput sequencing methods for microbiome profiling: application to food animal systems.
Highlander SK
Anim Health Res Rev; 2012 Jun; 13(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 22853944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intestinal microbiota domination under extreme selective pressures characterized by metagenomic read cloud sequencing and assembly.
Kang JB; Siranosian BA; Moss EL; Banaei N; Andermann TM; Bhatt AS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 16):585. PubMed ID: 31787070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Freshwater monitoring by nanopore sequencing.
Urban L; Holzer A; Baronas JJ; Hall MB; Braeuninger-Weimer P; Scherm MJ; Kunz DJ; Perera SN; Martin-Herranz DE; Tipper ET; Salter SJ; Stammnitz MR
Elife; 2021 Jan; 10():. PubMed ID: 33461660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Identification of city specific important bacterial signature for the MetaSUB CAMDA challenge microbiome data.
Walker AR; Datta S
Biol Direct; 2019 Jul; 14(1):11. PubMed ID: 31340852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Oxford Nanopore Technologies and Illumina MiSeq sequencing with mock communities and agricultural soil.
Stevens BM; Creed TB; Reardon CL; Manter DK
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9323. PubMed ID: 37291169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome.
Yap M; Feehily C; Walsh CJ; Fenelon M; Murphy EF; McAuliffe FM; van Sinderen D; O'Toole PW; O'Sullivan O; Cotter PD
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21665. PubMed ID: 33303873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Joining Illumina paired-end reads for classifying phylogenetic marker sequences.
Liu T; Chen CY; Chen-Deng A; Chen YL; Wang JY; Hou YI; Lin MC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):105. PubMed ID: 32171248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A fast and robust protocol for metataxonomic analysis using RNAseq data.
Cox JW; Ballweg RA; Taft DH; Velayutham P; Haslam DB; Porollo A
Microbiome; 2017 Jan; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 28103917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing.
Tessler M; Neumann JS; Afshinnekoo E; Pineda M; Hersch R; Velho LFM; Segovia BT; Lansac-Toha FA; Lemke M; DeSalle R; Mason CE; Brugler MR
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6589. PubMed ID: 28761145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. DNA extraction for streamlined metagenomics of diverse environmental samples.
Marotz C; Amir A; Humphrey G; Gaffney J; Gogul G; Knight R
Biotechniques; 2017 Jun; 62(6):290-293. PubMed ID: 28625159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Phylogenetic microbiota profiling in fecal samples depends on combination of sequencing depth and choice of NGS analysis method.
Rajan SK; Lindqvist M; Brummer RJ; Schoultz I; Repsilber D
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222171. PubMed ID: 31527871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison between 16S rRNA and shotgun sequencing data for the taxonomic characterization of the gut microbiota.
Durazzi F; Sala C; Castellani G; Manfreda G; Remondini D; De Cesare A
Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3030. PubMed ID: 33542369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pipeline for amplifying and analyzing amplicons of the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene.
Allen HK; Bayles DO; Looft T; Trachsel J; Bass BE; Alt DP; Bearson SM; Nicholson T; Casey TA
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Aug; 9():380. PubMed ID: 27485508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Defining the normal core microbiome of conjunctival microbial communities.
Huang Y; Yang B; Li W
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2016 Jul; 22(7):643.e7-643.e12. PubMed ID: 27102141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
