1477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29554948)
41. Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples.
Heravi FS; Zakrzewski M; Vickery K; Hu H
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105856. PubMed ID: 32007505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Intrinsic challenges in ancient microbiome reconstruction using 16S rRNA gene amplification.
Ziesemer KA; Mann AE; Sankaranarayanan K; Schroeder H; Ozga AT; Brandt BW; Zaura E; Waters-Rist A; Hoogland M; Salazar-García DC; Aldenderfer M; Speller C; Hendy J; Weston DA; MacDonald SJ; Thomas GH; Collins MJ; Lewis CM; Hofman C; Warinner C
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16498. PubMed ID: 26563586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. High throughput sequencing methods and analysis for microbiome research.
Di Bella JM; Bao Y; Gloor GB; Burton JP; Reid G
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Dec; 95(3):401-14. PubMed ID: 24029734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Benchmarking second and third-generation sequencing platforms for microbial metagenomics.
Meslier V; Quinquis B; Da Silva K; Plaza Oñate F; Pons N; Roume H; Podar M; Almeida M
Sci Data; 2022 Nov; 9(1):694. PubMed ID: 36369227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. OTUX: V-region specific OTU database for improved 16S rRNA OTU picking and efficient cross-study taxonomic comparison of microbiomes.
Yadav D; Dutta A; Mande SS
DNA Res; 2019 Apr; 26(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 30624596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Assessment of a 16S rRNA amplicon Illumina sequencing procedure for studying the microbiome of a symbiont-rich aphid genus.
Jousselin E; Clamens AL; Galan M; Bernard M; Maman S; Gschloessl B; Duport G; Meseguer AS; Calevro F; Coeur d'acier A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 May; 16(3):628-40. PubMed ID: 26458227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. What Is Metagenomics Teaching Us, and What Is Missed?
New FN; Brito IL
Annu Rev Microbiol; 2020 Sep; 74():117-135. PubMed ID: 32603623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Genome-Based Targeted Sequencing as a Reproducible Microbial Community Profiling Assay.
Benjamino J; Leopold B; Phillips D; Adams MD
mSphere; 2021 Apr; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 33827913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diversity of microbiota associated with symptomatic and non-symptomatic bacterial wilt-diseased banana plants determined using 16S rRNA metagenome sequencing.
Suhaimi NSM; Goh SY; Ajam N; Othman RY; Chan KG; Thong KL
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Aug; 33(9):168. PubMed ID: 28828756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Challenges of next-generation sequencing targeting anaerobes.
Conrads G; Abdelbary MMH
Anaerobe; 2019 Aug; 58():47-52. PubMed ID: 30769104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. metaBIT, an integrative and automated metagenomic pipeline for analysing microbial profiles from high-throughput sequencing shotgun data.
Louvel G; Der Sarkissian C; Hanghøj K; Orlando L
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Nov; 16(6):1415-1427. PubMed ID: 27238636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Evaluation of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing using two next-generation sequencing technologies for phylogenetic analysis of the rumen bacterial community in steers.
Myer PR; Kim M; Freetly HC; Smith TPL
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Aug; 127():132-140. PubMed ID: 27282101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Strainberry: automated strain separation in low-complexity metagenomes using long reads.
Vicedomini R; Quince C; Darling AE; Chikhi R
Nat Commun; 2021 Jul; 12(1):4485. PubMed ID: 34301928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Shotgun metagenome data of a defined mock community using Oxford Nanopore, PacBio and Illumina technologies.
Sevim V; Lee J; Egan R; Clum A; Hundley H; Lee J; Everroad RC; Detweiler AM; Bebout BM; Pett-Ridge J; Göker M; Murray AE; Lindemann SR; Klenk HP; O'Malley R; Zane M; Cheng JF; Copeland A; Daum C; Singer E; Woyke T
Sci Data; 2019 Nov; 6(1):285. PubMed ID: 31772173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Viral community predicts the geographical origin of fermented vegetable foods more precisely than bacterial community.
Jung MJ; Kim MS; Yun JH; Lee JY; Kim PS; Lee HW; Ha JH; Roh SW; Bae JW
Food Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 76():319-327. PubMed ID: 30166157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. UltraSEQ, a Universal Bioinformatic Platform for Information-Based Clinical Metagenomics and Beyond.
Gemler BT; Mukherjee C; Howland C; Fullerton PA; Spurbeck RR; Catlin LA; Smith A; Minard-Smith AT; Bartling C
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0416022. PubMed ID: 37039637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Multiomic Strategies Reveal Diversity and Important Functional Aspects of Human Gut Microbiome.
Ranjan R; Rani A; Finn PW; Perkins DL
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():6074918. PubMed ID: 30584534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A comparison of bioinformatic approaches for 16S rRNA gene profiling of food bacterial microbiota.
De Filippis F; Parente E; Zotta T; Ercolini D
Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 265():9-17. PubMed ID: 29107843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assembly methods for nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing: a comparative study.
Latorre-Pérez A; Villalba-Bermell P; Pascual J; Vilanova C
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13588. PubMed ID: 32788623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The effect of 16S rRNA region choice on bacterial community metabarcoding results.
Bukin YS; Galachyants YP; Morozov IV; Bukin SV; Zakharenko AS; Zemskaya TI
Sci Data; 2019 Feb; 6():190007. PubMed ID: 30720800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
