BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29555269)

  • 1. Performance characterisation of a passive cavitation detector optimised for subharmonic periodic shock waves from acoustic cavitation in MHz and sub-MHz ultrasound.
    Johansen K; Song JH; Prentice P
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2018 May; 43():146-155. PubMed ID: 29555269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Periodic shock-emission from acoustically driven cavitation clouds: a source of the subharmonic signal.
    Johnston K; Tapia-Siles C; Gerold B; Postema M; Cochran S; Cuschieri A; Prentice P
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Dec; 54(8):2151-8. PubMed ID: 25015000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrafast 2-dimensional image monitoring and array-based passive cavitation detection for ultrasound contrast agent destruction in a variably sized region.
    Xu S; Hu H; Jiang H; Xu Z; Wan M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1957-70. PubMed ID: 25336483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic emissions during 3.1 MHz ultrasound bulk ablation in vitro.
    Mast TD; Salgaonkar VA; Karunakaran C; Besse JA; Datta S; Holland CK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1434-48. PubMed ID: 18420337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting cavitation in mercury exposed to a high-energy pulsed proton beam.
    Manzi NJ; Chitnis PV; Holt RG; Roy RA; Cleveland RO; Riemer B; Wendel M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20370004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High intensity focused ultrasound lithotripsy with cavitating microbubbles.
    Yoshizawa S; Ikeda T; Ito A; Ota R; Takagi S; Matsumoto Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Aug; 47(8):851-60. PubMed ID: 19360448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time-resolved observations of shock waves and cavitation bubbles generated by femtosecond laser pulses in corneal tissue and water.
    Juhasz T; Kastis GA; Suárez C; Bor Z; Bron WE
    Lasers Surg Med; 1996; 19(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 8836993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A suppressor to prevent direct wave-induced cavitation in shock wave therapy devices.
    Matula TJ; Hilmo PR; Bailey MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 16119340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of frequency doubled double pulse Nd:YAG laser fiber proximity to the target stone on transient cavitation and acoustic emission.
    Fuh E; Haleblian GE; Norris RD; Albala WD; Simmons N; Zhong P; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 2007 Apr; 177(4):1542-5. PubMed ID: 17382775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inertial cavitation and associated acoustic emission produced during electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhong P; Cioanta I; Cocks FH; Preminger GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2940-50. PubMed ID: 9165740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative ultrasound method to detect and monitor laser-induced cavitation bubbles.
    Karpiouk AB; Aglyamov SR; Bourgeois F; Ben-Yakar A; Emelianov SY
    J Biomed Opt; 2008; 13(3):034011. PubMed ID: 18601556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-linear Acoustic Emissions from Therapeutically Driven Contrast Agent Microbubbles.
    Song JH; Moldovan A; Prentice P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):2188-2204. PubMed ID: 31085030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bubble proliferation in the cavitation field of a shock wave lithotripter.
    Pishchalnikov YA; Williams JC; McAteer JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL87-93. PubMed ID: 21877776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transfection effect of microbubbles on cells in superposed ultrasound waves and behavior of cavitation bubble.
    Kodama T; Tomita Y; Koshiyama K; Blomley MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 32(6):905-14. PubMed ID: 16785012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control of Acoustic Cavitation for Efficient Sonoporation with Phase-Shift Nanoemulsions.
    Burgess MT; Porter TM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):846-858. PubMed ID: 30638968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial-temporal dynamics of cavitation bubble clouds in 1.2 MHz focused ultrasound field.
    Chen H; Li X; Wan M
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2006 Sep; 13(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 16571378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploiting flow to control the in vitro spatiotemporal distribution of microbubble-seeded acoustic cavitation activity in ultrasound therapy.
    Pouliopoulos AN; Bonaccorsi S; Choi JJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(22):6941-57. PubMed ID: 25350470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Overpressure on Acoustic Emissions and Treated Tissue Histology in ex Vivo Bulk Ultrasound Ablation.
    Karunakaran CP; Burgess MT; Rao MB; Holland CK; Mast TD
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2360-2376. PubMed ID: 34023187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A dual passive cavitation detector for localized detection of lithotripsy-induced cavitation in vitro.
    Cleveland RO; Sapozhnikov OA; Bailey MR; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1745-58. PubMed ID: 10738826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Controllable Nucleation of Cavitation from Plasmonic Gold Nanoparticles for Enhancing High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Applications.
    McLaughlan JR
    J Vis Exp; 2018 Oct; (140):. PubMed ID: 30346394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.