These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29556923)

  • 1. Can physician examiners overcome their first impression when examinee performance changes?
    Wood TJ; Pugh D; Touchie C; Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Oct; 23(4):721-732. PubMed ID: 29556923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of first impressions on subsequent ratings within an OSCE station.
    Wood TJ; Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh D; Touchie C
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):969-983. PubMed ID: 27848171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implicit versus explicit first impressions in performance-based assessment: will raters overcome their first impressions when learner performance changes?
    Wood TJ; Daniels VJ; Pugh D; Touchie C; Halman S; Humphrey-Murto S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38010576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners.
    Zimmermann P; Kadmon M
    GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc40. PubMed ID: 32685668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters' divergent points of view.
    Gingerich A; Ramlo SE; van der Vleuten CPM; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):819-838. PubMed ID: 27651046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Augmenting physician examiner scoring in objective structured clinical examinations: including the standardized patient perspective.
    Roy M; Wojcik J; Bartman I; Smee S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2021 Mar; 26(1):313-328. PubMed ID: 32816242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the role of first impressions in rater-based assessments.
    Wood TJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Aug; 19(3):409-27. PubMed ID: 23529821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An exploration of "real time" assessments as a means to better understand preceptors' judgments of student performance.
    Luu K; Sidhu R; Chadha NK; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 Aug; 28(3):793-809. PubMed ID: 36441287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of portrayal by standardized patients: results from four OSCE stations conducted for high stakes examinations.
    Baig LA; Beran TN; Vallevand A; Baig ZA; Monroy-Cuadros M
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 May; 14():97. PubMed ID: 24884744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selecting and Simplifying: Rater Performance and Behavior When Considering Multiple Competencies.
    Tavares W; Ginsburg S; Eva KW
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 26787084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consistency of standards and stability of pass/fail decisions with examinee-based standard-setting methods in a small-scale objective structured clinical examination.
    Cusimano MD; Rothman AI
    Acad Med; 2004 Oct; 79(10 Suppl):S25-7. PubMed ID: 15383381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs.
    Harasym PH; Woloschuk W; Cunning L
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):617-32. PubMed ID: 17610034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for identifying extreme OSCE examiners.
    Bartman I; Smee S; Roy M
    Clin Teach; 2013 Feb; 10(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 23294740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of examinee gender, standardized-patient gender, and their interaction on standardized patients' ratings of examinees' interpersonal and communication skills.
    Colliver JA; Vu NV; Marcy ML; Travis TA; Robbs RS
    Acad Med; 1993 Feb; 68(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 8431238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring examiner judgement of professional competence in rater based assessment.
    Naumann FL; Marshall S; Shulruf B; Jones PD
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Oct; 21(4):775-88. PubMed ID: 26796200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Managing extremes of assessor judgment within the OSCE.
    Fuller R; Homer M; Pell G; Hallam J
    Med Teach; 2017 Jan; 39(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 27670246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectations, observations, and the cognitive processes that bind them: expert assessment of examinee performance.
    St-Onge C; Chamberland M; Lévesque A; Varpio L
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Aug; 21(3):627-42. PubMed ID: 26620923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relatively speaking: contrast effects influence assessors' scores and narrative feedback.
    Yeates P; Cardell J; Byrne G; Eva KW
    Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 49(9):909-19. PubMed ID: 26296407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences between Scores Assessed by Examiners and Examinees on Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
    Han MH; Park SG
    Korean J Med Educ; 2009 Sep; 21(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 25813316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of exposure to good vs poor medical trainee performance on attending physician ratings of subsequent performances.
    Yeates P; O'Neill P; Mann K; Eva KW
    JAMA; 2012 Dec; 308(21):2226-32. PubMed ID: 23212500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.