209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2955693)
1. Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
Sanz ML; Mancini J; LeFree MT; Mickelson JK; Starling MR; Vogel RA; Topol EJ
Am J Cardiol; 1987 Jul; 60(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 2955693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of coronary angioplasty by an automated digital angiographic method.
Katritsis D; Lythall DA; Anderson MH; Cooper IC; Webb-Peploe MW
Am Heart J; 1988 Nov; 116(5 Pt 1):1181-7. PubMed ID: 2973213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Establishing comprehensive, quantitative criteria for detection of restenosis and remodeling after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
de Cesare NB; Williamson PR; Moore NB; DeBoe SF; Mancini GB
Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jan; 69(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 1729871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements.
Serruys PW; Reiber JH; Wijns W; van den Brand M; Kooijman CJ; ten Katen HJ; Hugenholtz PG
Am J Cardiol; 1984 Sep; 54(6):482-8. PubMed ID: 6236686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Videodensitometric determination of minimum coronary artery luminal diameter before and after angioplasty.
Tobis J; Nalcioglu O; Johnston WD; Qu L; Reese T; Sato D; Roeck W; Montelli S; Henry WL
Am J Cardiol; 1987 Jan; 59(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 2949580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maximal myocardial perfusion by videodensitometry in the assessment of the early and late results of coronary angioplasty: relationship with coronary artery measurements and left ventricular function at rest.
Vassanelli C; Menegatti G; Molinari J; Zanotto G; Zanolla L; Loschiavo I; Zardini P
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1995 Apr; 34(4):301-10; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 7621539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of measurements of coronary narrowings by videodensitometry and by digital calipers.
Balkin J; Rosenmann D; Ilan M; Zion MM
Cardiology; 1992; 81(4-5):238-44. PubMed ID: 1301249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative angiography during coronary angioplasty with a single angiographic view: a comparison of automated edge detection and videodensitometric techniques.
Escaned J; Foley DP; Haase J; Di Mario C; Hermans WR; de Feyter PJ; Serruys PW
Am Heart J; 1993 Dec; 126(6):1326-33. PubMed ID: 8249789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Definition and measurement of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: implications for clinical trials.
Lespérance J; Bourassa MG; Schwartz L; Hudon G; Laurier J; Eastwood C; Kazim F
Am Heart J; 1993 May; 125(5 Pt 1):1394-408. PubMed ID: 8480594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in cross-sectional area of the coronary lumen in the six months after angioplasty: a quantitative analysis of the variable response to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.
Johnson MR; Brayden GP; Ericksen EE; Collins SM; Skorton DJ; Harrison DG; Marcus ML; White CW
Circulation; 1986 Mar; 73(3):467-75. PubMed ID: 2936530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of coronary arterial stenosis before and after PTCA: visual estimation versus computer-assisted analysis].
Sawada T; Azuma A; Furukawa K; Terashima S; Kawata K; Tatsukawa H; Sugihara H; Kono Y; Asayama J; Katsume H
Kokyu To Junkan; 1991 Mar; 39(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 2047604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography.
Herrington DM; Siebes M; Sokol DK; Siu CO; Walford GD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 22(4):1068-74. PubMed ID: 8409042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of observer and videodensitometric measurements of simulated coronary artery stenoses.
Simons MA; Bastian BV; Bray BE; Dedrickson DR
Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):562-8. PubMed ID: 3305413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital subtraction angiography in angioplasty of total coronary artery occlusion.
Carlson EB; Morris KG; Hinohara T; Sintetos AL
Chest; 1987 Sep; 92(3):560-2. PubMed ID: 2957177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of the effects of angioplasty on coronary stenosis using quantitative video angiography.
Bove AA; Holmes DR; Owen RM; Bresnahan JF; Reeder GS; Smith HC; Vlietstra RE
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985; 11(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 3156673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concept of maximal flow ratio for immediate evaluation of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty result by videodensitometry.
Pijls NH; Aengevaeren WR; Uijen GJ; Hoevelaken A; Pijnenburg T; van Leeuwen K; van der Werf T
Circulation; 1991 Mar; 83(3):854-65. PubMed ID: 1999036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the residual translesional pressure gradient useful to predict regional myocardial perfusion after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty?
MacIsaac HC; Knudtson ML; Robinson VJ; Manyari DE
Am Heart J; 1989 Apr; 117(4):783-90. PubMed ID: 2522717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of coronary angioplasty: comparison of visual assessment, hand-held caliper measurement and automated digital quantitation.
Katritsis D; Lythall DA; Cooper IC; Crowther A; Webb-Peploe MM
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 15(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 2976306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Visual and quantitative evaluation of coronarography findings in patients with percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography].
Aschermann M; Ferguson JJ
Vnitr Lek; 1993 Jul; 39(7):645-50. PubMed ID: 8372459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancy between visual estimation and computer-assisted measurement of lesion severity before and after coronary angioplasty.
Desmet W; Willems J; Van Lierde J; Piessens J
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Mar; 31(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 8025935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
