These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29557683)

  • 21. Multivariate prediction of upper limb prosthesis acceptance or rejection.
    Biddiss EA; Chau TT
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2008 Jul; 3(4):181-92. PubMed ID: 19238719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada.
    Kyberd PJ; Hill W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21697204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scales (TAPES) in lower limb amputees.
    Topuz S; Ülger Ö; Yakut Y; Gül Şener F
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 21697202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using the common sense self-regulation model to determine psychological predictors of prosthetic use and activity limitations in lower limb amputees.
    Callaghan B; Condie E; Johnston M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 18825576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Upper- and lower-limb amputees show reduced levels of eeriness for images of prosthetic hands.
    Buckingham G; Parr J; Wood G; Day S; Chadwell A; Head J; Galpin A; Kenney L; Kyberd P; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1295-1302. PubMed ID: 31183744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses.
    Millstein SG; Heger H; Hunter GA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Apr; 10(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 3725563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs.
    Murray CD
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Aug; 26(16):963-73. PubMed ID: 15371044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales and quality of life in people with lower-limb amputation.
    Gallagher P; Maclachlan M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 May; 85(5):730-6. PubMed ID: 15129396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implications of prosthesis funding structures on the use of prostheses: experiences of individuals with upper limb absence.
    Biddiss E; McKeever P; Lindsay S; Chau T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 21515898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life.
    Østlie K; Lesjø IM; Franklin RJ; Garfelt B; Skjeldal OH; Magnus P
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Nov; 7(6):479-93. PubMed ID: 22315926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The geriatric amputee after discharge from successful rehabilitation--a study of former patients of the "Eifelhöhenklinik" rehabilitation center in Nettersheim-Marmagen].
    Marmann C
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1994 May; 33(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 8052736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reachability and the sense of embodiment in amputees using prostheses.
    Gouzien A; de Vignemont F; Touillet A; Martinet N; De Graaf J; Jarrassé N; Roby-Brami A
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4999. PubMed ID: 28694439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Upper limb traumatic amputees. Review of prosthetic use.
    Gaine WJ; Smart C; Bransby-Zachary M
    J Hand Surg Br; 1997 Feb; 22(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 9061532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: a long-term outcome study.
    Dillingham TR; Pezzin LE; MacKenzie EJ; Burgess AR
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Aug; 80(8):563-71. PubMed ID: 11475475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Functional status and prosthesis use in amputees, measured with the Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee (PPA) and the short version of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP68).
    Streppel KR; de Vries J; van Harten WH
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2001 Sep; 24(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11560243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees.
    van Lunteren A; van Lunteren-Gerritsen GH; Stassen HG; Zuithoff MJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1983 Dec; 7(3):141-51. PubMed ID: 6647010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Artificial limb representation in amputees.
    van den Heiligenberg FMZ; Orlov T; Macdonald SN; Duff EP; Henderson Slater D; Beckmann CF; Johansen-Berg H; Culham JC; Makin TR
    Brain; 2018 May; 141(5):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 29534154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bone-anchored prostheses in patients with traumatic bilateral transfemoral amputations: rehabilitation description and outcome in 12 cases treated with the OPRA implant system.
    Hagberg K
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 May; 14(4):346-353. PubMed ID: 29534624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Latlief G; Klinger SL; Sasson N; Walters LS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):456-66. PubMed ID: 24286806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.