231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29557825)
1. Robotic vs Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer in Elderly Patients: Surgical Outcome, Survival, and Cost Analysis.
Lindfors A; Åkesson Å; Staf C; Sjöli P; Sundfeldt K; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 May; 28(4):692-699. PubMed ID: 29557825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic vs. open surgery in obese women with low-grade endometrial cancer: comparison of costs and quality of life measures.
Sofer A; Magnezi R; Eitan R; Raban O; Tal O; Smorgic N; Vaknin Z
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2020 Nov; 9(1):60. PubMed ID: 33138857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative outcomes in older and younger women undergoing laparotomy or robotic surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
Guy MS; Sheeder J; Behbakht K; Wright JD; Guntupalli SR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):350.e1-350.e10. PubMed ID: 26433173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term survival in obese patients after robotic or open surgery for endometrial cancer.
Lindfors A; Heshar H; Adok C; Sundfeldt K; Dahm-Kähler P
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 158(3):673-680. PubMed ID: 32527569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications.
Marino P; Houvenaeghel G; Narducci F; Boyer-Chammard A; Ferron G; Uzan C; Bats AS; Mathevet P; Dessogne P; Guyon F; Rouanet P; Jaffre I; Carcopino X; Perez T; Lambaudie E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1102-8. PubMed ID: 26098092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
Herling SF
Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Post robotic investment: Cost consequences and impact on length of stay for obese women with endometrial cancer.
Korsholm M; Gyrd-Hansen D; Mogensen O; Möller S; Joergensen SL; Jensen PT
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Oct; 100(10):1830-1839. PubMed ID: 34322867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long term resource consequences of a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery for women with early stage endometrial cancer.
Korsholm M; Gyrd-Hansen D; Mogensen O; Möller S; Sopina L; Joergensen SL; Jensen PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):411-419. PubMed ID: 31176554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A retrospective evaluation of the perioperative drug use and comparison of its cost in robotic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer.
Agarwal R; Rajanbabu A; Unnikrishnan UG
J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):665-672. PubMed ID: 29569172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer.
Lundin ES; Carlsson P; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32863275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Teamwork and High-Volume Experience Overcome Challenges of Lymphadenectomy in Morbidly Obese Patients (Body Mass Index of 40 kg/m2 or Greater) with Endometrial Cancer?: A Cohort Study of Robotics and Laparotomy and Review of Literature.
Fornalik H; Zore T; Fornalik N; Foster T; Katschke A; Wright G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):959-966. PubMed ID: 29621128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
Avondstondt AM; Wallenstein M; D'Adamo CR; Ehsanipoor RM
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 28439744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis].
Li XM; Wang J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 52(3):175-183. PubMed ID: 28355689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of robotics on the outcome of elderly patients with endometrial cancer.
Lavoue V; Zeng X; Lau S; Press JZ; Abitbol J; Gotlieb R; How J; Wang Y; Gotlieb WH
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):556-62. PubMed ID: 24708920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients.
Madden N; Frey MK; Joo L; Lee J; Musselman K; Chern JY; Blank SV; Pothuri B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):253.e1-253.e7. PubMed ID: 30557552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
