These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29559945)

  • 21. Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements.
    Sakrisvold ML; Granhag PA; Mac Giolla E
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 28247431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do liars really remember what they lied upon? The impact of fabrication on memory.
    Battista F; Mangiulli I; Riesthuis P; Curci A; Otgaar H
    Memory; 2021 Sep; 29(8):1076-1090. PubMed ID: 34339348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learning to Detect Deception from Evasive Answers and Inconsistencies across Repeated Interviews: A Study with Lay Respondents and Police Officers.
    Masip J; Martínez C; Blandón-Gitlin I; Sánchez N; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2207. PubMed ID: 29354078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How humans impair automated deception detection performance.
    Kleinberg B; Verschuere B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103250. PubMed ID: 33450692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Unanticipated questions can yield unanticipated outcomes in investigative interviews.
    Parkhouse T; Ormerod TC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208751. PubMed ID: 30532180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.
    Fenn E; McGuire M; Langben S; Blandón-Gitlin I
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1298. PubMed ID: 26379610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automated verbal credibility assessment of intentions: The model statement technique and predictive modeling.
    Kleinberg B; van der Toolen Y; Vrij A; Arntz A; Verschuere B
    Appl Cogn Psychol; 2018; 32(3):354-366. PubMed ID: 29861544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Insurance based lie detection: Enhancing the verifiability approach with a model statement component.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Lafferty M; Nahari G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():1-8. PubMed ID: 28088655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Thermal imaging as a lie detection tool at airports.
    Warmelink L; Vrij A; Mann S; Leal S; Forrester D; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 21061052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do True and False Intentions Differ in Level of Abstraction? A Test of Construal Level Theory in Deception Contexts.
    Calderon S; Mac Giolla E; Granhag PA; Ask K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2037. PubMed ID: 29209261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How deception and believability feedback affect recall.
    Vo TVA; Gunderson CA; Ten Brinke L
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):706-714. PubMed ID: 33557706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 'Please tell me all you remember': a comparison between British and Arab interviewees' free narrative performance and its implications for lie detection.
    Vrij A; Leal S; Mann S; Vernham Z; Dalton G; Serok-Jeppa O; Rozmann N; Nahari G; Fisher RP
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(4):546-559. PubMed ID: 35558151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sex and personality traits influence the difference between time taken to tell the truth or lie.
    Farrow TF; Reilly R; Rahman TA; Herford AE; Woodruff PW; Spence SA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 14620232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Registered report: measuring unconscious deception detection by skin temperature.
    van ' T Veer AE; Stel M; van Beest I; Gallucci M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():442. PubMed ID: 24904461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detecting Lies via a Theme-Selection Strategy.
    Palena N; Caso L; Vrij A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2775. PubMed ID: 30687204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT).
    Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; de la Riva C; Herrero C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():45-55. PubMed ID: 27219533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does the truth come out in the writing? Scan as a lie detection tool.
    Nahari G; Vrij A; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Feb; 36(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 22471387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Both High Cognitive Load and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex Make Truth and Lie Responses More Similar.
    Sánchez N; Masip J; Gómez-Ariza CJ
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():776. PubMed ID: 32508700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions.
    Warmelink L; Vrij A; Mann S; Jundi S; Granhag PA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 22964059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.