These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29559945)

  • 41. Jumping the gun: Faster response latencies to deceptive questions in a realistic scenario.
    Mapala T; Warmelink L; Linkenauger SA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1350-1358. PubMed ID: 28290127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.
    Vrij A; Mann SA; Fisher RP; Leal S; Milne R; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 17694424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Lie Detection Using fNIRS Monitoring of Inhibition-Related Brain Regions Discriminates Infrequent but not Frequent Liars.
    Li F; Zhu H; Xu J; Gao Q; Guo H; Wu S; Li X; He S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():71. PubMed ID: 29593514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles.
    Newman ML; Pennebaker JW; Berry DS; Richards JM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 May; 29(5):665-75. PubMed ID: 15272998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception.
    Hauch V; Blandón-Gitlin I; Masip J; Sporer SL
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Nov; 19(4):307-42. PubMed ID: 25387767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Detecting deception via eyeblink frequency modulation.
    Perelman BS
    PeerJ; 2014; 2():e260. PubMed ID: 24688844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. ID-Check: Online Concealed Information Test Reveals True Identity.
    Verschuere B; Kleinberg B
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61 Suppl 1():S237-40. PubMed ID: 26390033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The first direct replication on using verbal credibility assessment for the detection of deceptive intentions.
    Kleinberg B; Warmelink L; Arntz A; Verschuere B
    Appl Cogn Psychol; 2018; 32(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 30333683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Unconscious deception detection measured by finger skin temperature and indirect veracity judgments-results of a registered report.
    van 't Veer AE; Gallucci M; Stel M; van Beest I
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():672. PubMed ID: 26106339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Unraveling the Misconception About Deception and Nervous Behavior.
    Vrij A; Fisher RP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1377. PubMed ID: 32625154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Catching a Liar Through Facial Expression of Fear.
    Shen X; Fan G; Niu C; Chen Z
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():675097. PubMed ID: 34168597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Deception detection: State of the art and future prospects.
    Masip J
    Psicothema; 2017 May; 29(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 28438235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Confidence Can Be Used to Discriminate Between Accurate and Inaccurate Lie Decisions.
    Smith AM; Leach AM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Nov; 14(6):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 31539484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Review of Approaches to Detecting Malingering in Forensic Contexts and Promising Cognitive Load-Inducing Lie Detection Techniques.
    Walczyk JJ; Sewell N; DiBenedetto MB
    Front Psychiatry; 2018; 9():700. PubMed ID: 30622488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Verifiability on the run: an experimental study on the verifiability approach to malingered symptoms.
    Boskovic I; Gallardo CT; Vrij A; Hope L; Merckelbach H
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 31984064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Physically scarce (vs. enriched) environments decrease the ability to tell lies successfully.
    Ten Brinke L; Khambatta P; Carney DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Oct; 144(5):982-92. PubMed ID: 26301794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008).
    O'Sullivan M
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):493-7; discussion 501-3. PubMed ID: 18605815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Functional MRI analysis of deception among people with antisocial personality disorders].
    Jiang W; Liao J; Liu H; Tang Y; Wang W
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Nov; 37(11):1141-6. PubMed ID: 23202625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.