These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29560366)

  • 1. Sensitivity and Specificity of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm and Standard Full Threshold Perimetry in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma.
    Bamdad S; Beigi V; Sedaghat MR
    Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2017; 6(4):125-129. PubMed ID: 29560366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm compared with standard full threshold algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing.
    Sekhar GC; Naduvilath TJ; Lakkai M; Jayakumar AJ; Pandi GT; Mandal AK; Honavar SG
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Jul; 107(7):1303-8. PubMed ID: 10889102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; Hancock SA; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1152-61. PubMed ID: 10235548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of the Humphrey perimetry programs SITA Standard and SITA Fast in normal probands and patients with glaucoma].
    Nordmann JP; Brion F; Hamard P; Mouton-Chopin D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Oct; 21(8):549-54. PubMed ID: 9833219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin?
    Conway ML; Hosking SL; Zhu H; Cubbidge RP
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 14():166. PubMed ID: 25539569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.
    Capris P; Autuori S; Capris E; Papadia M
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
    Sharma AK; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Mohsin M
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Narang P; Agarwal A; Srinivasan M; Agarwal A
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun; 1(2):100035. PubMed ID: 36249304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors.
    Singh MD; Jain K
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1999 Apr; 77(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 10321527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers.
    Johnson CA; Sherman K; Doyle C; Wall M
    J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
    King AJ; Taguri A; Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement precision in a series of visual fields acquired by the standard and fast versions of the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm: analysis of large-scale data from clinics.
    Saunders LJ; Russell RA; Crabb DP
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 25340390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Prea SM; Kong YXG; Mehta A; He M; Crowston JG; Gupta V; Martin KR; Vingrys AJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 190():9-16. PubMed ID: 29550190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
    Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.