205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29560624)
21. Automatic quantitative analysis of in-stent restenosis using FD-OCT in vivo intra-arterial imaging.
Mandelias K; Tsantis S; Spiliopoulos S; Katsakiori PF; Karnabatidis D; Nikiforidis GC; Kagadis GC
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063101. PubMed ID: 23718609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ex vivo assessment of neointimal characteristics after drug-eluting stent implantation: Optical coherence tomography and histopathology validation study.
Imanaka T; Fujii K; Hao H; Shibuya M; Saita T; Kawakami R; Fukunaga M; Kawai K; Tamaru H; Miki K; Horimatsu T; Sumiyoshi A; Nishimura M; Hirota S; Masuyama T; Ishihara M
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():1043-7. PubMed ID: 27447812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography for bioresorbable scaffold luminal investigation: a comparison with optical coherence tomography.
Collet C; Sotomi Y; Cavalcante R; Asano T; Miyazaki Y; Tenekecioglu E; Kistlaar P; Zeng Y; Suwanasson P; de Winter RJ; Nieman K; Serruys PW; Onuma Y
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Mar; 33(3):431-439. PubMed ID: 27896495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Automatic segmentation of in-vivo intra-coronary optical coherence tomography images to assess stent strut apposition and coverage.
Ughi GJ; Adriaenssens T; Onsea K; Kayaert P; Dubois C; Sinnaeve P; Coosemans M; Desmet W; D'hooge J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Feb; 28(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 21347593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Randomized Comparison Between Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Stent: Multimodality Imaging Through 3 Years.
Onuma Y; Honda Y; Asano T; Shiomi H; Kozuma K; Ozaki Y; Namiki A; Yasuda S; Ueno T; Ando K; Furuya J; Hanaoka KI; Tanabe K; Okada K; Kitahara H; Ono M; Kusano H; Rapoza R; Simonton C; Popma JJ; Stone GW; Fitzgerald PJ; Serruys PW; Kimura T
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 13(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 31918929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automated segmentation of metal stent and bioresorbable vascular scaffold in intravascular optical coherence tomography images using deep learning architectures.
Lau YS; Tan LK; Chan CK; Chee KH; Liew YM
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Dec; 66(24):. PubMed ID: 34911053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Post-dilatation after implantation of bioresorbable everolimus- and novolimus-eluting scaffolds: an observational optical coherence tomography study of acute mechanical effects.
Blachutzik F; Boeder N; Wiebe J; Mattesini A; Dörr O; Most A; Bauer T; Röther J; Tröbs M; Schlundt C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 106(4):271-279. PubMed ID: 27757522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative analysis method of permanent metallic stents (XIENCE) and bioresorbable poly-L-lactic (PLLA) scaffolds (Absorb) on optical coherence tomography at baseline and follow-up.
Nakatani S; Sotomi Y; Ishibashi Y; Grundeken MJ; Tateishi H; Tenekecioglu E; Zeng Y; Suwannasom P; Regar E; Radu MD; Räber L; Bezerra H; Costa MA; Fitzgerald P; Prati F; Costa RA; Dijkstra J; Kimura T; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Akasaka T; Di Mario C; Serruys PW; Onuma Y
EuroIntervention; 2016 Dec; 12(12):1498-1509. PubMed ID: 26448577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Strut protrusion and shape impact on endothelial shear stress: insights from pre-clinical study comparing Mirage and Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds.
Tenekecioglu E; Sotomi Y; Torii R; Bourantas C; Miyazaki Y; Collet C; Crake T; Su S; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1313-1322. PubMed ID: 28365819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Head-to-head comparison of the neointimal response between metallic and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds using optical coherence tomography.
Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Farooq V; Onuma Y; Diletti R; Windecker S; Thuesen L; McClean D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Dudek D; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Regar E; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA; Garcia-Garcia HM; Serruys PW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 22192368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Corner Detection Based Automatic Segmentation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Struts in IVOCT Images.
Qin X; Yao L; Jin Q; Jing J; Chen Y; Cao Y; Li J; Zhu R
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():604-607. PubMed ID: 30440469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Application and Evaluation of Highly Automated Software for Comprehensive Stent Analysis in Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography.
Lu H; Lee J; Jakl M; Wang Z; Cervinka P; Bezerra HG; Wilson DL
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2150. PubMed ID: 32034252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Peri-strut low intensity areas and in-scaffold neointima growth after bioresorbable scaffold implantation in STEMI. A serial optical coherence tomography study.
Ochijewicz D; Tomaniak M; Kołtowski L; Rdzanek A; Pietrasik A; Proniewska K; Partyka L; Dijsktra J; Huczek Z; Filipiak K; Opolski G; Kochman J
Int J Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 312():27-32. PubMed ID: 32315682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intracoronary optical coherence tomography and histology at 1 month and 2, 3, and 4 years after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in a porcine coronary artery model: an attempt to decipher the human optical coherence tomography images in the ABSORB trial.
Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Perkins LE; Okamura T; Gonzalo N; García-García HM; Regar E; Kamberi M; Powers JC; Rapoza R; van Beusekom H; van der Giessen W; Virmani R
Circulation; 2010 Nov; 122(22):2288-300. PubMed ID: 20975003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three dimensional reconstruction of coronary artery stents from optical coherence tomography: experimental validation and clinical feasibility.
Wu W; Khan B; Sharzehee M; Zhao S; Samant S; Watanabe Y; Murasato Y; Mickley T; Bicek A; Bliss R; Valenzuela T; Iaizzo PA; Makadia J; Panagopoulos A; Burzotta F; Samady H; Brilakis ES; Dangas GD; Louvard Y; Stankovic G; Dubini G; Migliavacca F; Kassab GS; Edelman ER; Chiastra C; Chatzizisis YS
Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):12252. PubMed ID: 34112841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is quantitative coronary angiography reliable in assessing the lumen gain after treatment with the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable polylactide scaffold?
Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Suwannasom P; Tateishi H; Tenekecioglu E; Zeng Y; Cavalcante R; Jonker H; Dijkstra J; Foin N; Koon JN; Collet C; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Stone GW; Popma JJ; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Serruys PW; Kimura T
EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(8):e998-e1008. PubMed ID: 27721215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. OCT-assessment of scaffold resorption: Analysis of strut intensity by a new resorption index for poly-l-lactic acid bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Marwan M; Tröbs M; Boeder N; Doerr O; Weissner M; Bauer T; Nef H; Hamm C; Schlundt C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Dec; 94(7):928-935. PubMed ID: 30945432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Relationship between peri-strut low intensity areas and vascular healing response after everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation: An optical coherence tomography study.
Sato T; Jose J; El-Mawardy M; Sulimov DS; Tölg R; Richardt G; Abdel-Wahab M
J Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 69(4):606-612. PubMed ID: 27520757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Serial 5-Year Evaluation of Side Branches Jailed by Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Using 3-Dimensional Optical Coherence Tomography: Insights From the ABSORB Cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
Onuma Y; Grundeken MJ; Nakatani S; Asano T; Sotomi Y; Foin N; Ng J; Okamura T; Wykrzykowska JJ; de Winter RJ; van Geuns RJ; Koolen J; Christiansen EH; Whitbourn R; McClean D; Smits P; Windecker S; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 28893770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is high pressure postdilation safe in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds? Optical coherence tomography observations after noncompliant balloons inflated at more than 24 atmospheres.
Fabris E; Caiazzo G; Kilic ID; Serdoz R; Secco GG; Sinagra G; Lee R; Foin N; Di Mario C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):839-46. PubMed ID: 26370357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
