These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29561483)

  • 1. Does Mixed Conventional/Piezosurgery Implant Site Preparation Affect Implant Stability?
    Alattar AN; Bede SYH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 29(5):e472-e475. PubMed ID: 29561483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of conventional twist drill protocol and piezosurgery for implant insertion: an ex vivo study on different bone types.
    Sagheb K; Kumar VV; Azaripour A; Walter C; Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 26799448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: twist drills versus piezosurgery. A single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Stacchi C; Vercellotti T; Torelli L; Furlan F; Di Lenarda R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 21682844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the effect of preparation of the implant sites with piezosurgery and conventional drilling on the stability of implants at 5-months follow-up.
    Soheilifar S; Bidgoli M; Houshyar E; Farhadian M; Ghamari A
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2018; 28(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29772986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Piezoelectric vs. conventional drilling in implant site preparation: pilot controlled randomized clinical trial with crossover design.
    Canullo L; Peñarrocha D; Peñarrocha M; Rocio AG; Penarrocha-Diago M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1336-43. PubMed ID: 24147994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in implant stability associated with various methods of preparation of the implant bed: an in vitro study.
    Ahn SJ; Leesungbok R; Lee SW; Heo YK; Kang KL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 22633592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: Osseodensification drills versus piezoelectric surgery. A multi-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Stacchi C; Troiano G; Montaruli G; Mozzati M; Lamazza L; Antonelli A; Giudice A; Lombardi T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):133-140. PubMed ID: 36190150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical analysis of the stability of dental implants after preparation of the site by conventional drilling or piezosurgery.
    da Silva Neto UT; Joly JC; Gehrke SA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 52(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 24268822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Piezoelectric vs. conventional implant site preparation: ex vivo implant primary stability.
    Baker JA; Vora S; Bairam L; Kim HI; Davis EL; Andreana S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 22092442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conventional Drilling Versus Piezosurgery for Implant Site Preparation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Sendyk DI; de Oliveira NK; Pannuti CM; da Graça Naclério-Homem M; Wennerberg A; Deboni MCZ
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Oct; 44(5):400-405. PubMed ID: 29583059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Undersized implant site preparation to enhance primary implant stability in poor bone density: a prospective clinical study.
    Alghamdi H; Anand PS; Anil S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):e506-12. PubMed ID: 22117707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Osteotome and Conventional Drilling Techniques for Primary Implant Stability: An In Vitro Study.
    Tsolaki IN; Tonsekar PP; Najafi B; Drew HJ; Sullivan AJ; Petrov SD
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Aug; 42(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 26938712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of local cancellous bone amelioration by poly-L-DL-lactide copolymers to improve primary stability of dental implants: a biomechanical study in sheep.
    Stübinger S; Waser J; Hefti T; Drechsler A; Sidler M; Klein K; von Rechenberg B; Schlottig F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):572-80. PubMed ID: 24989873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Primary and Secondary Stability of Implants with Anodized Surfaces and Implants Treated by Acids: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira GJ; Leite FC; Pontes AE; Sakakura CE; Junior EM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):186-90. PubMed ID: 26800177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a clinical study including bone density, insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis data.
    Turkyilmaz I; Aksoy U; McGlumphy EA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 18384409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial focusing on implant stability changes during early healing.
    Waechter J; Madruga MM; Carmo Filho LCD; Leite FRM; Schinestsck AR; Faot F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Aug; 19(4):733-741. PubMed ID: 28557376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant Stability Quotients of Osteotome Bone Expansion and Conventional Drilling Technique for 4.1 mm Diameter Implant at Posterior Mandible.
    Hong HH; Hong A; Yang LY; Chang WY; Huang YF; Lin YT
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 19(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 27665748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized clinical 1-year trial comparing two types of non-submerged dental implants.
    Park JC; Ha SR; Kim SM; Kim MJ; Lee JB; Lee JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 20070756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A correlation between bone (B), insertion torque (IT), and implant stability (S): BITS score.
    Herekar M; Sethi M; Ahmad T; Fernandes AS; Patil V; Kulkarni H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):805-10. PubMed ID: 24726588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.