BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29562309)

  • 1. Diagnostic Utility of Twist1, Ki-67, and E-Cadherin in Diagnosing Molar Gestations and Hydropic Abortions.
    Moussa RA; Eesa AN; Abdallah ZF; Abdelmeged A; Mahran A; Bahaa H
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2018 Mar; 149(5):442-455. PubMed ID: 29562309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immunohistochemical analysis of c-erbB-2, Bcl-2, p53, p21
    Missaoui N; Landolsi H; Mestiri S; Essakly A; Abdessayed N; Hmissa S; Mokni M; Yacoubi MT
    Pathol Res Pract; 2019 Mar; 215(3):446-452. PubMed ID: 30558966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphological, immunohistochemical and chromosome in situ hybridization in the differential diagnosis of Hydatidiform Mole and Hydropic Abortion.
    Maggiori MS; Peres LC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Dec; 135(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 17602823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Roles of p57KIP2 immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry in diagnosis of molar pregnancy].
    Yang SM; You JF; Zhang XW; Zheng J; Liao SL
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Sep; 38(9):580-4. PubMed ID: 20079184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the role of histopathology and DNA image analysis in the diagnosis of molar and non-molar abortion: a study of 89 cases in the center of Tunisia.
    Landolsi H; Missaoui N; Yacoubi MT; Trabelsi A; Rammeh-Rommani S; Hidar S; Gribaa M; Hmissa S; Mokni M
    Pathol Res Pract; 2009; 205(11):789-96. PubMed ID: 19665315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnostic value of Ki-67, P53 and P63 in distinguishing partial Hydatidiform mole from hydropic abortion.
    Chen Y; Shen D; Gu Y; Zhong P; Xie J; Song Q
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2012 Mar; 124(5-6):184-7. PubMed ID: 22218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The usefulness of p57(KIP2) immunohistochemical staining and genotyping test in the diagnosis of the hydatidiform mole.
    Landolsi H; Missaoui N; Brahem S; Hmissa S; Gribaa M; Yacoubi MT
    Pathol Res Pract; 2011 Aug; 207(8):498-504. PubMed ID: 21767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter-observer variability in the histologic criteria of diagnosis of hydatidiform moles.
    Sarmadi S; Izadi-Mood N; Sanii S; Motevalli D
    Malays J Pathol; 2019 Apr; 41(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 31025633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Molecular genetic testing from paraffin-embedded tissue distinguishes nonmolar hydropic abortion from hydatidiform mole.
    Bell KA; Van Deerlin V; Addya K; Clevenger CV; Van Deerlin PG; Leonard DG
    Mol Diagn; 1999 Mar; 4(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10229770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Immunohistochemistry of p57 and p53 protein in differential diagnosis of hydropic abortion, partial and complete hydatidiform mole].
    Chen YX; Shen DH; Gu YQ; Zhong PP; Xie JL; Song QJ; Zhang YL; Wen J
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 40(10):694-7. PubMed ID: 22321550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immunohistochemical Analysis of E-Cadherin, p53 and Inhibin-α Expression in Hydatidiform Mole and Hydropic Abortion.
    Erol O; Süren D; Tutuş B; Toptaş T; Gökay AA; Derbent AU; Özel MK; Sezer C
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Jul; 22(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 26683836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molar gestations and hydropic abortions differentiated by p57 immunostaining.
    Romaguera RL; Rodriguez MM; Bruce JH; Zuluaga T; Viciana A; Penalver MA; Mehrdad N
    Fetal Pediatr Pathol; 2004; 23(2-3):181-90. PubMed ID: 15768863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Challenges in the Routine Praxis Diagnosis of Hydatidiform Mole: a Tertiary Health Center Experience.
    Lelic M; Fatusic Z; Iljazovic E; Ramic S; Markovic S; Alicelebic S
    Med Arch; 2017 Aug; 71(4):256-260. PubMed ID: 28974845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical application of STR genotyping diagnosis for hydatidiform mole and nonmolar gestation].
    Zheng XZ; Qin XY; Wang P; Xu F; Ma JH; Wang XL; Chen SW; Feng WQ; Zhu L; Yin CH; Wu BQ
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 47(8):609-615. PubMed ID: 30107666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. p57kip2 is useful in the classification and differential diagnosis of complete and partial hydatidiform moles.
    Jun SY; Ro JY; Kim KR
    Histopathology; 2003 Jul; 43(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 12823708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. p57-discordant villi in hydropic products of conception: a clinicopathological study of 70 cases.
    Gaillot-Durand L; Patrier S; Aziza J; Devisme L; Riera AC; Marcorelles P; Pelluard F; Gasser B; Mauduit C; Hajri T; Massardier J; Bolze PA; Golfier F; Devouassoux-Shisheboran M; Allias F
    Hum Pathol; 2020 Jul; 101():18-30. PubMed ID: 32387104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proliferative activity in placentas with hydropic change and hydatidiform mole as detected by Ki-67 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunostaining.
    Ostrzega N; Phillipson J; Liu P
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Dec; 110(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 9844590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of p57, c-erbB-2, CD117, and Bcl-2 expression in the differential diagnosis of hydatidiform mole and hydropic abortion.
    Erol O; Suren D; Tutus B; Yararbas K; Sayiner A; Ozel MK; Derbent AU; Sezer C
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2016 Aug; 37(4):522-529. PubMed ID: 29894078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of proliferation cell nuclear antigen immunoreactivity for distinguishing hydropic abortions from partial hydatidiform moles.
    Suresh UR; Hale RJ; Fox H; Buckley CH
    J Clin Pathol; 1993 Jan; 46(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 8094402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic reproducibility of hydatidiform moles: ancillary techniques (p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping) improve morphologic diagnosis for both recently trained and experienced gynecologic pathologists.
    Gupta M; Vang R; Yemelyanova AV; Kurman RJ; Li FR; Maambo EC; Murphy KM; DeScipio C; Thompson CB; Ronnett BM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Dec; 36(12):1747-60. PubMed ID: 22992698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.