178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29562375)
1. Parameters influencing the quality of colonoscopy in Belgium : a critical evaluation.
Macken E; Van Dongen S; Francque S; Van Hal G
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2018; 81(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 29562375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A retrospective analysis of the histology of resected polyps and colonoscopy quality parameters in Belgium.
Macken E; Van Dongen S; Van Hal G
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2023; 86(2):277-285. PubMed ID: 37428160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Annual colonoscopy volume and maintenance of competency for surgeons.
Pace D; Borgaonkar M; Evans B; Marcoux C; Lougheed M; Falk V; Hickey N; O'Leary M; McGrath J; Boone D
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jun; 31(6):2630-2635. PubMed ID: 27752813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician Non-adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.
Johnson MR; Grubber J; Grambow SC; Maciejewski ML; Dunn-Thomas T; Provenzale D; Fisher DA
Gastroenterology; 2015 Oct; 149(4):938-51. PubMed ID: 26122143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Longitudinal assessment of colonoscopy quality indicators: a report from the Gastroenterology Practice Management Group.
Hernandez LV; Deas TM; Catalano MF; Guda NM; Huang L; Ketover SR; Etzkorn KP; Gutta KG; Morris SJ; Schmalz MJ; Klyve D; Allen JI
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Nov; 80(5):835-41. PubMed ID: 24818549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Quality of colonoscopy defines the success of colorectal cancer screening].
Peeters PH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(24):A4605. PubMed ID: 22742443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polyps are detected more often in early colonoscopies.
Zhang Z; Chen X; Cao T; Ning Y; Wang H; Wang F; Zhao Q; Fang J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(9):1085-1090. PubMed ID: 37122125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of moderate versus deep sedation on adenoma detection rate in index average-risk screening colonoscopies.
Turse EP; Dailey FE; Bechtold ML
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Sep; 90(3):502-505. PubMed ID: 31102644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection.
Sawhney MS; Cury MS; Neeman N; Ngo LH; Lewis JM; Chuttani R; Pleskow DK; Aronson MD
Gastroenterology; 2008 Dec; 135(6):1892-8. PubMed ID: 18835390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
Lee TJ; Rutter MD; Blanks RG; Moss SM; Goddard AF; Chilton A; Nickerson C; McNally RJ; Patnick J; Rees CJ
Gut; 2012 Jul; 61(7):1050-7. PubMed ID: 21940723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy.
Imperiale TF; Glowinski EA; Juliar BE; Azzouz F; Ransohoff DF
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jun; 69(7):1288-95. PubMed ID: 19481649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practice patterns of sedation for colonoscopy.
Childers RE; Williams JL; Sonnenberg A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Sep; 82(3):503-11. PubMed ID: 25851159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Longitudinal Study of Adenoma Detection Rate in Gastroenterology Fellowship Training.
Gianotti RJ; Oza SS; Tapper EB; Kothari D; Sheth SG
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Oct; 61(10):2831-2837. PubMed ID: 27405989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in screening vs non-screening colonoscopy: scope for improvement?
Ahmed S; Naumann DN; Karandikar S
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Sep; 18(9):903-9. PubMed ID: 26850216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.
Radaelli F; Meucci G; Sgroi G; Minoli G;
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1122-30. PubMed ID: 18445096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quality indicators for colonoscopy: differences in polyp detection between endoscopists at one hospital].
van Lelyveld N; van Oijen MG; Schwartz MP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(24):A4219. PubMed ID: 22742441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assessment of colonoscopy in Flanders: a voluntary survey among Flemish gastroenterologist.
Macken E; Vannoote J; Moreels T; Peeters M; Wouters K
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2015; 78(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26118574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]