These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29562765)

  • 1. Comparison of Flexible Ureterorenoscope Quality of Vision: An In Vitro Study.
    Talso M; Proietti S; Emiliani E; Gallioli A; Dragos L; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Giusti G; Montanari E; Somani B; Traxer O
    J Endourol; 2018 Jun; 32(6):523-528. PubMed ID: 29562765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation.
    Dragos LB; Somani BK; Sener ET; Buttice S; Proietti S; Ploumidis A; Iacoboaie CT; Doizi S; Traxer O
    J Endourol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):630-637. PubMed ID: 28478744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Spies
    Emiliani E; Talso M; Baghdadi M; Barreiro A; Orosa A; Serviàn P; Gavrilov P; Proietti S; Traxer O
    Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(3):476-480. PubMed ID: 28338307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of laser fiber passage in ureteroscopic maximum deflection and their influence on deflection and irrigation: Do we really need the ball tip concept?
    Baghdadi M; Emiliani E; Talso M; Servián P; Barreiro A; Orosa A; Proietti S; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):313-318. PubMed ID: 27300338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fiberoptic versus Digital: A Comparison of Durability and Cost Effectiveness of the Two Flexible Ureteroscopes.
    Temiz MZ; Colakerol A; Ertas K; Tuken M; Yuruk E
    Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):181-186. PubMed ID: 30463076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope.
    Somani BK; Al-Qahtani SM; de Medina SD; Traxer O
    Urology; 2013 Nov; 82(5):1017-9. PubMed ID: 24001703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach.
    Marchini GS; Batagello CA; Monga M; Torricelli FCM; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
    J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29239229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standardized ex vivo comparison of different upper urinary tract biopsy devices: impact on ureterorenoscopes and tissue quality.
    Ritter M; Bolenz C; Bach T; Ströbel P; Häcker A
    World J Urol; 2013 Aug; 31(4):907-12. PubMed ID: 22451168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
    Göger YE; Özkent MS; Kılınç MT; Taşkapu HH; Göger E; Aydın A; Sönmez MG; Karalezli G
    World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3643-3650. PubMed ID: 33738574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
    Dale J; Kaplan AG; Radvak D; Shin R; Ackerman A; Chen T; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 27981862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current Disposable Ureteroscopes: Performance and Limitations in a Standardized Kidney Model.
    Schlager D; Obaid MA; Hein S; Wilhelm K; Schönthaler M; Gratzke C; Miernik A; Schoeb DS
    J Endourol; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 32475165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison.
    Tom WR; Wollin DA; Jiang R; Radvak D; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28978227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of pre- and post-surgical images of reusable and single use flexible ureteroscopes: a qualitative analysis.
    Domenech A; Alliende C; Vivaldi B; Pizzi P
    Cent European J Urol; 2021; 74(3):459-463. PubMed ID: 34729238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes.
    Proietti S; Somani B; Sofer M; Pietropaolo A; Rosso M; Saitta G; Gaboardi F; Traxer O; Giusti G
    J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1090-1095. PubMed ID: 28835120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-use
    Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B
    J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study.
    Mager R; Kurosch M; Höfner T; Frees S; Haferkamp A; Neisius A
    Urolithiasis; 2018 Nov; 46(6):587-593. PubMed ID: 29356873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.
    Usawachintachit M; Isaacson DS; Taguchi K; Tzou DT; Hsi RS; Sherer BA; Stoller ML; Chi T
    J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28287823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes.
    Multescu R; Geavlete B; Geavlete P
    Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1236-9. PubMed ID: 23992972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reusable, Single-Use, or Both: A Cost Efficiency Analysis of Flexible Ureterorenoscopes After 983 Cases.
    Van Compernolle D; Veys R; Elshout PJ; Beysens M; Van Haute C; De Groote L; Tailly T
    J Endourol; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1454-1459. PubMed ID: 33775101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.