These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29563243)

  • 1. Local interactions and self-organized spatial patterns stabilize microbial cross-feeding against cheaters.
    Stump SM; Johnson EC; Klausmeier CA
    J R Soc Interface; 2018 Mar; 15(140):. PubMed ID: 29563243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How leaking and overproducing resources affect the evolutionary robustness of cooperative cross-feeding.
    Stump SM; Johnson EC; Klausmeier CA
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Oct; 454():278-291. PubMed ID: 29908186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How spatial structure and neighbor uncertainty promote mutualists and weaken black queen effects.
    Stump SM; Johnson EC; Sun Z; Klausmeier CA
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 446():33-60. PubMed ID: 29499252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cooperation in microbial communities and their biotechnological applications.
    Cavaliere M; Feng S; Soyer OS; Jiménez JI
    Environ Microbiol; 2017 Aug; 19(8):2949-2963. PubMed ID: 28447371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbial cross-feeding promotes multiple stable states and species coexistence, but also susceptibility to cheaters.
    Sun Z; Koffel T; Stump SM; Grimaud GM; Klausmeier CA
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Mar; 465():63-77. PubMed ID: 30639296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rethinking mutualism stability: cheaters and the evolution of sanctions.
    Frederickson ME
    Q Rev Biol; 2013 Dec; 88(4):269-95. PubMed ID: 24552098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial self-organization favors heterotypic cooperation over cheating.
    Momeni B; Waite AJ; Shou W
    Elife; 2013 Nov; 2():e00960. PubMed ID: 24220506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competitive resource allocation to metabolic pathways contributes to overflow metabolisms and emergent properties in cross-feeding microbial consortia.
    Carlson RP; Beck AE; Phalak P; Fields MW; Gedeon T; Hanley L; Harcombe WR; Henson MA; Heys JJ
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2018 Apr; 46(2):269-284. PubMed ID: 29472366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eco-evolutionary modelling of microbial syntrophy indicates the robustness of cross-feeding over cross-facilitation.
    Boza G; Barabás G; Scheuring I; Zachar I
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):907. PubMed ID: 36650168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The coexistence of hosts with different abilities to discriminate against cheater partners: an evolutionary game-theory approach.
    Steidinger BS; Bever JD
    Am Nat; 2014 Jun; 183(6):762-70. PubMed ID: 24823820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Population dynamics of microbial cross-feeding are determined by co-localization probabilities and cooperation-independent cheater growth.
    van Tatenhove-Pel RJ; de Groot DH; Bisseswar AS; Teusink B; Bachmann H
    ISME J; 2021 Oct; 15(10):3050-3061. PubMed ID: 33953364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Privatization of cooperative benefits stabilizes mutualistic cross-feeding interactions in spatially structured environments.
    Pande S; Kaftan F; Lang S; Svatoš A; Germerodt S; Kost C
    ISME J; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1413-23. PubMed ID: 26623546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cheating can stabilize cooperation in mutualisms.
    Foster KR; Kokko H
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Sep; 273(1598):2233-9. PubMed ID: 16901844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stability of Cross-Feeding Polymorphisms in Microbial Communities.
    Gudelj I; Kinnersley M; Rashkov P; Schmidt K; Rosenzweig F
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1005269. PubMed ID: 28036324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coexistence of mutualists and antagonists: exploring the impact of cheaters on the yucca - yucca moth mutualism.
    Marr DL; Brock MT; Pellmyr O
    Oecologia; 2001 Aug; 128(3):454-463. PubMed ID: 24549915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pervasive Selection for Cooperative Cross-Feeding in Bacterial Communities.
    Germerodt S; Bohl K; Lück A; Pande S; Schröter A; Kaleta C; Schuster S; Kost C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Jun; 12(6):e1004986. PubMed ID: 27314840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing the out-of-Florida hypothesis on the origin of cheating in the yucca-yucca moth mutualism.
    Segraves KA; Pellmyr O
    Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2266-79. PubMed ID: 15562689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limiting cheaters in mutualism: evidence from hybridization between mutualist and cheater yucca moths.
    Segraves KA; Althoff DM; Pellmyr O
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Oct; 272(1577):2195-201. PubMed ID: 16191630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cheaters in mutualism networks.
    Genini J; Morellato LP; Guimarães PR; Olesen JM
    Biol Lett; 2010 Aug; 6(4):494-7. PubMed ID: 20089538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbial secretor-cheater dynamics.
    Frank SA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Aug; 365(1552):2515-22. PubMed ID: 20643741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.