These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29564407)

  • 1. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in pellucid marginal degeneration.
    Sedaghat MR; Ostadi-Moghadam H; Jabbarvand M; Askarizadeh F; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Narooie-Noori F
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 30(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 29564407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Jardim D; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 20138369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.
    Galletti JG; Pförtner T; Bonthoux FF
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 22230059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic capacity of biomechanical indices from a dynamic bidirectional applanation device in pellucid marginal degeneration.
    Labiris G; Giarmoukakis A; Sideroudi H; Song X; Kozobolis V; Seitz B; Gatzioufas Z
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1006-12. PubMed ID: 24774010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of Ocular Biomechanics in Pellucid Marginal Degeneration.
    Lenk J; Haustein M; Terai N; Spoerl E; Raiskup F
    Cornea; 2016 Apr; 35(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 26890659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corneal biomechanical evaluation in healthy thin corneas compared with matched keratoconus cases.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2011; 74(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 21670900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ORA waveform-derived biomechanical parameters to distinguish normal from keratoconic eyes.
    Luz A; Fontes BM; Lopes B; Ramos I; Schor P; Ambrósio R
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 23828472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Central Corneal Thickness in Glaucoma Patients, Glaucoma Suspects, and a Healthy Population.
    Del Buey-Sayas MÁ; Lanchares-Sancho E; Campins-Falcó P; Pinazo-Durán MD; Peris-Martínez C
    J Clin Med; 2021 Jun; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 34203884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
    Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in corneal biomechanics in patients with keratoconus after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Yenerel NM; Kucumen RB; Gorgun E
    Cornea; 2010 Nov; 29(11):1247-51. PubMed ID: 20697286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The corneal volume and biomechanical corneal factors: Is there any orrelation?
    Sedaghat MR; Sharepoor M; Hassanzadeh S; Abrishami M
    J Res Med Sci; 2012 Jan; 17(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 23248654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children.
    Lim L; Gazzard G; Chan YH; Fong A; Kotecha A; Sim EL; Tan D; Tong L; Saw SM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Sep; 49(9):3852-7. PubMed ID: 18469185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal-tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):e48-53. PubMed ID: 21914145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normative values and contralateral comparison of anterior chamber parameters measured by Pentacam and its correlation with corneal biomechanical factors.
    Sedaghat MR; Mohammad Zadeh V; Fadakar K; Kadivar S; Abrishami M
    Saudi J Ophthalmol; 2017; 31(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 28337056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does corneal hysteresis correlate with endothelial cell density?
    Akova-Budak B; Kıvanç SA
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1460-3. PubMed ID: 25994302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal Biomechanics Determination in Healthy Myopic Subjects.
    Qiu K; Lu X; Zhang R; Wang G; Zhang M
    J Ophthalmol; 2016; 2016():2793516. PubMed ID: 27525109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry.
    Touboul D; Roberts C; Kérautret J; Garra C; Maurice-Tison S; Saubusse E; Colin J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 34(4):616-22. PubMed ID: 18361984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keratoconus and normal-tension glaucoma: a study of the possible association with abnormal biomechanical properties as measured by corneal hysteresis.
    Cohen EJ; Myers JS
    Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):955-70. PubMed ID: 20517150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Thickness in Primary Congenital Glaucoma and Normal Eyes: A Comparative Study.
    Zareei A; Razeghinejad MR; Salouti R
    Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2018; 7(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 30250855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.