182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29564805)
1. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry and 2 new devices, Tonoref III and RS-3000.
Desmond T; Arthur P; Watt K
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 39(4):917-923. PubMed ID: 29564805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of central corneal thickness measurements using Topcon TRK-1P, Zeiss Visante AS-OCT and DGH Pachmate 55 handheld ultrasonic pachymeter.
Wells M; Wu N; Kokkinakis J; Sutton G
Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jul; 96(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 23336739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of central corneal thickness in healthy eyes using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy and a high-resolution Scheimpflug camera.
Soulantzou K; Plakitsi A; Chalkiadaki E; Anastasopoulou M; Karmiris E
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):363-370. PubMed ID: 35864284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter.
Gokcinar NB; Yumusak E; Ornek N; Yorubulut S; Onaran Z
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 29984376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement using the Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry].
Hao GS; Zeng L; Li YR; Shui D
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 47(2):142-5. PubMed ID: 21426844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry.
Huang J; Savini G; Hu L; Hoffer KJ; Lu W; Feng Y; Yang F; Hu X; Wang Q
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 23218819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.
Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Reproducibility of the measurement of central corneal thickness in healthy subjects obtained with the optical low coherence reflectometry pachymeter and comparison with the ultrasonic pachymetry].
Garza-Leon M; Plancarte-Lozano E; Valle-Penella AD; Guzmán-Martínez ML; Villarreal-González A
Cir Cir; 2018; 86(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 29681640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement and reliability in measuring central corneal thickness with a rotating Scheimpflug-Placido system and ultrasound pachymetry.
Maresca N; Zeri F; Palumbo P; Calossi A
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Dec; 37(6):442-6. PubMed ID: 25151203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of ultrasound pachymetry and partial coherence interferometry in the measurement of central corneal thickness.
Rainer G; Petternel V; Findl O; Schmetterer L; Skorpik C; Luksch A; Drexler W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Dec; 28(12):2142-5. PubMed ID: 12498849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Contact and Non-contact Pachymetry Devices.
Mayali H; Altinisik M; Diri I; Ilker S; Kurt E; Kayikcioglu O
J Curr Glaucoma Pract; 2021; 15(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 34393453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of topcon optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
Northey LC; Gifford P; Boneham GC
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1708-14. PubMed ID: 23190715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Corneal thickness in keratoconus: comparing optical, ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography pachymetry.
Dutta D; Rao HL; Addepalli UK; Vaddavalli PK
Ophthalmology; 2013 Mar; 120(3):457-463. PubMed ID: 23177363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of central corneal thickness with optical low-coherence reflectometry and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.
Huang J; Liao N; Savini G; Li Y; Bao F; Yu Y; Yu A; Wang Q
Cornea; 2015 Feb; 34(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 25514702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
Erdur SK; Demirci G; Dikkaya F; Kocabora MS; Ozsutcu M
Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(6):782-787. PubMed ID: 29509052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of central corneal thickness as measured by non-contact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and post LASIK.
Zhao MH; Zou J; Wang WQ; Li J
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 35(9):818-23. PubMed ID: 18173409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry.
Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Elbaz U; Schwartz S; Ken-Dror G; Avni I; Zadok D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1729-35. PubMed ID: 16246776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Central corneal thickness measurements obtained with anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography compared to ultrasound pachymetry in healthy subjects.
Vollmer L; Sowka J; Pizzimenti J; Yu X
Optometry; 2012 May; 83(5):167-72. PubMed ID: 23249119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Optical and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Glaucoma Patients and Elderly and Young Controls.
Pillunat KR; Waibel S; Spoerl E; Herber R; Pillunat LE
J Glaucoma; 2019 Jun; 28(6):540-545. PubMed ID: 30855412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
