277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29564832)
21. Elucidating the origin of chromosomal aberrations in IVF embryos by preimplantation genetic analysis.
Frumkin T; Malcov M; Yaron Y; Ben-Yosef D
Mol Cell Endocrinol; 2008 Jan; 282(1-2):112-9. PubMed ID: 18177997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Dahdouh EM; Balayla J; García-Velasco JA
Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Mar; 30(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 25599824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos.
Fragouli E; Alfarawati S; Spath K; Wells D
Mol Hum Reprod; 2014 Feb; 20(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 24184690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evidence of Selection against Complex Mitotic-Origin Aneuploidy during Preimplantation Development.
McCoy RC; Demko ZP; Ryan A; Banjevic M; Hill M; Sigurjonsson S; Rabinowitz M; Petrov DA
PLoS Genet; 2015 Oct; 11(10):e1005601. PubMed ID: 26491874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy?
Zaninovic N; Irani M; Meseguer M
Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):722-729. PubMed ID: 29101997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Temporal and developmental-stage variation in the occurrence of mitotic errors in tripronuclear human preimplantation embryos.
Mantikou E; van Echten-Arends J; Sikkema-Raddatz B; van der Veen F; Repping S; Mastenbroek S
Biol Reprod; 2013 Aug; 89(2):42. PubMed ID: 23863408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Time-lapse monitoring technologies for the selection of bovine in vitro fertilized embryos with high implantation potential.
Magata F
J Reprod Dev; 2023 Apr; 69(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 36775299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Genetic diseases and aneuploidies can be detected with a single blastocyst biopsy: a successful clinical approach.
Minasi MG; Fiorentino F; Ruberti A; Biricik A; Cursio E; Cotroneo E; Varricchio MT; Surdo M; Spinella F; Greco E
Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1770-1777. PubMed ID: 28633287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Use of time-lapse monitoring in medically assisted reproduction treatments: a mini-review.
Sciorio R
Zygote; 2021 Apr; 29(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 33228819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.
Barash OO; Ivani KA; Willman SP; Rosenbluth EM; Wachs DS; Hinckley MD; Pittenger Reid S; Weckstein LN
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Aug; 34(8):1007-1016. PubMed ID: 28560610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Blastulation rates decline in a linear fashion from euploid to aneuploid embryos with single versus multiple chromosomal errors.
Vega M; Breborowicz A; Moshier EL; McGovern PG; Keltz MD
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):394-8. PubMed ID: 24890269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of chromosomal abnormalities on preimplantation embryo development.
Rubio C; Rodrigo L; Mercader A; Mateu E; Buendía P; Pehlivan T; Viloria T; De los Santos MJ; Simón C; Remohí J; Pellicer A
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Aug; 27(8):748-56. PubMed ID: 17546708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review.
van Echten-Arends J; Mastenbroek S; Sikkema-Raddatz B; Korevaar JC; Heineman MJ; van der Veen F; Repping S
Hum Reprod Update; 2011; 17(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 21531753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evolution of aneuploidy up to Day 4 of human preimplantation development.
Mertzanidou A; Spits C; Nguyen HT; Van de Velde H; Sermon K
Hum Reprod; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1716-24. PubMed ID: 23526301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A cautionary note against embryo aneuploidy risk assessment using time-lapse imaging.
Ottolini C; Rienzi L; Capalbo A
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 24433755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage.
Capalbo A; Wright G; Elliott T; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L; Nagy ZP
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2298-307. PubMed ID: 23739221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Next-generation sequencing analysis of each blastomere in good-quality embryos: insights into the origins and mechanisms of embryonic aneuploidy in cleavage-stage embryos.
Shi Q; Qiu Y; Xu C; Yang H; Li C; Li N; Gao Y; Yu C
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Jul; 37(7):1711-1718. PubMed ID: 32445153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations.
Sundvall L; Ingerslev HJ; Breth Knudsen U; Kirkegaard K
Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3215-21. PubMed ID: 24070998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Chromosome constitution of human embryos generated after in vitro maturation including 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine in the oocyte collection medium.
Spits C; Guzman L; Mertzanidou A; Jacobs K; Ortega-Hrepich C; Gilchrist RB; Thompson JG; De Vos M; Smitz J; Sermon K
Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):653-63. PubMed ID: 25475586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Genome stability of bovine in vivo-conceived cleavage-stage embryos is higher compared to in vitro-produced embryos.
Tšuiko O; Catteeuw M; Zamani Esteki M; Destouni A; Bogado Pascottini O; Besenfelder U; Havlicek V; Smits K; Kurg A; Salumets A; D'Hooghe T; Voet T; Van Soom A; Robert Vermeesch J
Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2348-2357. PubMed ID: 29040498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
