134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29565691)
1. The Power to Detect and Predict Individual Differences in Intra-Individual Variability Using the Mixed-Effects Location-Scale Model.
Walters RW; Hoffman L; Templin J
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):360-374. PubMed ID: 29565691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.
Burr H; Formazin M; Pohrt A
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2016 May; 42(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 26960179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fitting correlated residual error structures in nonlinear mixed-effects models using SAS PROC NLMIXED.
Harring JR; Blozis SA
Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):372-84. PubMed ID: 24114379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling Individual Differences in Within-Person Variation of Negative and Positive Affect in a Mixed Effects Location Scale Model Using BUGS/JAGS.
Rast P; Hofer SM; Sparks C
Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Mar; 47(2):177-200. PubMed ID: 26734847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Mixed-Effects Location Scale Model for Dyadic Interactions.
Rast P; Ferrer E
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):756-775. PubMed ID: 30395725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An application of a mixed-effects location scale model for analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data.
Hedeker D; Mermelstein RJ; Demirtas H
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):627-34. PubMed ID: 17970819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
Gaskin CJ; Happell B
Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modelling inter-individual differences in latent within-person variation: The confirmatory factor level variability model.
Nestler S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73(3):452-473. PubMed ID: 31912895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of multiple indicators on the power to detect inter-individual differences in change.
von Oertzen T; Hertzog C; Lindenberger U; Ghisletta P
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):627-46. PubMed ID: 20211053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical power as a function of Cronbach alpha of instrument questionnaire items.
Heo M; Kim N; Faith MS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():86. PubMed ID: 26467219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conducting sensitivity analyses to identify and buffer power vulnerabilities in studies examining substance use over time.
Lane SP; Hennes EP
Addict Behav; 2019 Jul; 94():117-123. PubMed ID: 30309635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An overview of variance inflation factors for sample-size calculation.
Hsieh FY; Lavori PW; Cohen HJ; Feussner JR
Eval Health Prof; 2003 Sep; 26(3):239-57. PubMed ID: 12971199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From Noise to Signal: The Age and Social Patterning of Intra-Individual Variability in Late-Life Health.
Lin J; Kelley-Moore JA
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2017 Jan; 72(1):168-179. PubMed ID: 26320123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability in exercise physiology: Can capturing
Chrzanowski-Smith OJ; Piatrikova E; Betts JA; Williams S; Gonzalez JT
Eur J Sport Sci; 2020 May; 20(4):452-460. PubMed ID: 31397212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of varying the number of response alternatives in rating scales: experimental evidence from intra-individual effects.
Maydeu-Olivares A; Kramp U; García-Forero C; Gallardo-Pujol D; Coffman D
Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 19363170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Meta-Meta-Analysis: Empirical Review of Statistical Power, Type I Error Rates, Effect Sizes, and Model Selection of Meta-Analyses Published in Psychology.
Cafri G; Kromrey JD; Brannick MT
Multivariate Behav Res; 2010 Mar; 45(2):239-70. PubMed ID: 26760285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size determination for longitudinal designs with binary response.
Kapur K; Bhaumik R; Tang XC; Hur K; Reda DJ; Bhaumik DK
Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3781-800. PubMed ID: 24820424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A practical guide and power analysis for GLMMs: detecting among treatment variation in random effects.
Kain MP; Bolker BM; McCoy MW
PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1226. PubMed ID: 26401446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of multinomial and binomial proportion methods for analysis of multinomial count data.
Galyean ML; Wester DB
J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3452-63. PubMed ID: 20601524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
