150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29566393)
1. The Influence of Cognitive Bias on Caries Lesion Detection in Preschool Children.
Moro BLP; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Gimenez T; Lara JS; Raggio DP; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2018; 52(5):420-428. PubMed ID: 29566393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the discomfort reported by children on the performance of approximal caries detection methods.
Novaes TF; Matos R; Raggio DP; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2010; 44(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 20861630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of the radiographic method on treatment decisions related to dental caries in primary molars: a before-after study.
Pontes LRA; Novaes TF; Lara JS; Moro BLP; Gimenez T; Raggio DP; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Nov; 23(11):4075-4081. PubMed ID: 30778687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What diagnostic strategy performs better for caries lesion detection on proximal surfaces of adolescents?
Moriyama CM; Novaes TF; Ferreira FR; Moro BLP; Imparato JCP; Diniz MB; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jun; 25(6):3977-3986. PubMed ID: 33404759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic and laser fluorescence methods have no benefits for detecting caries in primary teeth.
Mendes FM; Novaes TF; Matos R; Bittar DG; Piovesan C; Gimenez T; Imparato JC; Raggio DP; Braga MM
Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):536-43. PubMed ID: 22907166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of the DIAGNOcam and bitewing radiographs in the diagnosis of cavitated proximal carious lesions in primary molars.
Alamoudi NM; Khan JA; El-Ashiry EA; Felemban OM; Bagher SM; Al-Tuwirqi AA
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1576-1582. PubMed ID: 31719280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratorial training of examiners for using a visual caries detection system in epidemiological surveys.
Piovesan C; Moro BL; Lara JS; Ardenghi TM; Guedes RS; Haddad AE; Braga MM; Mendes FM
BMC Oral Health; 2013 Oct; 13():49. PubMed ID: 24090355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vivo comparison of radiographic and clinical examination with separation for assessment of approximal caries in primary teeth.
Coutinho TC; daRocha Costa C
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 25517582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of contact points on the performance of caries detection methods in approximal surfaces of primary molars: an in vivo study.
Ribeiro AA; Purger F; Rodrigues JA; Oliveira PR; Lussi A; Monteiro AH; Alves HD; Assis JT; Vasconcellos AB
Caries Res; 2015; 49(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 25572115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of examiner experience on clinical performance of visual inspection in detecting and assessing the activity status of caries lesions.
Gimenez T; Bittar DG; Piovesan C; Guglielmi CA; Fujimoto KY; Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):583-90. PubMed ID: 23617691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Negligible therapeutic impact, false-positives, overdiagnosis and lead-time are the reasons why radiographs bring more harm than benefits in the caries diagnosis of preschool children.
Pontes LRA; Lara JS; Novaes TF; Freitas JG; Gimenez T; Moro BLP; Maia HCM; Imparato JCP; Braga MM; Raggio DP; Mendes FM;
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):168. PubMed ID: 33789655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of examiner's clinical experience in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Bengtson AL; Gomes AC; Mendes FM; Cichello LR; Bengtson NG; Pinheiro SL
Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 16173230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implications of caries diagnostic strategies for clinical management decisions.
Baelum V; Hintze H; Wenzel A; Danielsen B; Nyvad B
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 40(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 22103270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of interdental spacing on the detection of proximal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Novaes TF; Matos R; Celiberti P; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 22790495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Activity assessment has little impact on caries parameters reduction in epidemiological surveys with preschool children.
Piovesan C; Ardenghi TM; Guedes RS; Ekstrand KR; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 41(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 23004568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can we trust visual methods alone for detecting caries in teeth?
Hoskin ER; Keenan AV
Evid Based Dent; 2016 Jun; 17(2):41-2. PubMed ID: 27339234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth.
Rocha RO; Ardenghi TM; Oliveira LB; Rodrigues CR; Ciamponi AL
Caries Res; 2003; 37(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 14571122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the radiographic examination on diagnosis and treatment decision of caries lesions in primary teeth--the Caries Detection in Children (CARDEC-01) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Mendes FM; Pontes LR; Gimenez T; Lara JS; de Camargo LB; Michel-Crosato E; Pannuti CM; Raggio DP; Braga MM; Novaes TF;
Trials; 2016 Feb; 17():69. PubMed ID: 26857821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions in a group of 5-year-old Turkish children in Kadikoy, Istanbul.
Kuvvetli SS; Cildir SK; Ergeneli S; Sandalli N
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 18647511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]