These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29567062)

  • 1. Time to Talk: Can Radiologists Improve Follow-Up of Abdominal Imaging Findings Indeterminate for Malignancy by Initiating Verbal Communication?
    Liao GJ; Liao JM; Lalevic D; Cook TS; Zafar HM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Nov; 15(11):1627-1632. PubMed ID: 29567062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Location, Location, Location: The Association Between Imaging Setting and Follow-Up of Findings of Indeterminate Malignant Potential.
    Liao GJ; Liao JM; Lalevic D; Zafar HM; Cook TS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jun; 16(6):781-787. PubMed ID: 30661998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiologists' Recommendations for Additional Imaging on Inpatient CT Studies: Do Referring Physicians Follow Them?
    Hanley O; Lotfi A; Sanborn T; Friderici JL; Fitzgerald J; Manikantan P; Canty L; Stefan MS
    South Med J; 2017 Dec; 110(12):770-774. PubMed ID: 29197311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiologist-Patient Communication: Current Practices and Barriers to Communication in Breast Imaging.
    Aminololama-Shakeri S; Soo MS; Grimm LJ; Watts MR; Poplack SP; Rapelyea J; Saphier N; Stack R; Destounis S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 May; 16(5):709-716. PubMed ID: 30580958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in Follow-up Imaging Recommendations in Radiology Reports: Patient, Modality, and Radiologist Predictors.
    Cochon LR; Kapoor N; Carrodeguas E; Ip IK; Lacson R; Boland G; Khorasani R
    Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):700-707. PubMed ID: 31063082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors underlying variation in receipt of physician advice on diet and exercise: applications of the behavioral model of health care utilization.
    Honda K
    Am J Health Promot; 2004; 18(5):370-7. PubMed ID: 15163138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An assessment of the likelihood, frequency, and content of verbal communication between radiologists and women receiving screening and diagnostic mammography.
    Carney PA; Kettler M; Cook AJ; Geller BM; Karliner L; Miglioretti DL; Bowles EA; Buist DS; Gallagher TH; Elmore JG
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1056-63. PubMed ID: 19442539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment summaries, follow-up care instructions, and patient navigation: could they be combined to improve cancer survivor's receipt of follow-up care?
    Jabson JM
    J Cancer Surviv; 2015 Dec; 9(4):692-8. PubMed ID: 25764272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defining the abdominal radiologist based on the current U.S. job market.
    Hoffman DH; Rosenkrantz AB
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):3184-3187. PubMed ID: 29574558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who Refers Musculoskeletal Extremity Imaging Examinations to Radiologists?
    Harkey P; Duszak R; Gyftopoulos S; Rosenkrantz AB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Apr; 210(4):834-841. PubMed ID: 29489411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in Perceptions Among Radiologists, Referring Physicians, and Patients Regarding Language for Incidental Findings Reporting.
    Rosenkrantz AB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):140-143. PubMed ID: 27657356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.
    JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential?
    Singh H; Thomas EJ; Mani S; Sittig D; Arora H; Espadas D; Khan MM; Petersen LA
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Sep; 169(17):1578-86. PubMed ID: 19786677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utilization of outpatient diagnostic imaging. Does the physician's gender play a role?
    Rosen MP; Davis RB; Lesky LG
    J Gen Intern Med; 1997 Jul; 12(7):407-11. PubMed ID: 9229278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiologists' recommendations for additional imaging (RAI) in the inpatient setting.
    Squillaci E; Bolacchi F; Ricci F; De Stasio V; Pugliese L; Di Martino A; Floris R
    Radiol Med; 2019 May; 124(5):432-437. PubMed ID: 30600436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency of recommendations for additional imaging in diagnostic ultrasound examinations: Evaluation of radiologist, technologist, and other examination-related factors.
    Margolis NE; Rosenkrantz AB; Babb JS; Macari M
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2015 Oct; 43(8):463-8. PubMed ID: 25704133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting standards for the imaging-based diagnosis of renal masses on CT and MRI: a national survey of academic abdominal radiologists and urologists.
    Davenport MS; Hu EM; Smith AD; Chandarana H; Hafez K; Palapattu GS; Stuart Wolf J; Silverman SG;
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Apr; 42(4):1229-1240. PubMed ID: 27878338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double Scan CT Rates: An Opportunity for Facility-Based Radiologist Measures in the Quality Payment Program.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Babb JS; Nicola GN; Silva E; Wang W; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Mar; 15(3 Pt A):429-436. PubMed ID: 29275918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recommendations for Additional Imaging on Head and Neck Imaging Examinations: Interradiologist Variation and Associated Factors.
    Guenette JP; Lynch E; Abbasi N; Schulz K; Kumar S; Haneuse S; Kapoor N; Lacson R; Khorasani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 May; 222(5):e2330511. PubMed ID: 38294159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome of liver lesions indeterminate for malignancy on ultrasound: the role of patient age, risk status, and lesion echogenicity.
    Wnorowski AM; Cook TS; Lalevic D; Langer JE; Zafar HM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):2970-2979. PubMed ID: 29594466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.