BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29567108)

  • 1. Alternative outcomes create biased expectations regarding the received outcome: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Marciano D; Bentin S; Deouell LY
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 May; 113():126-139. PubMed ID: 29567108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Alternative Omen Effect: Illusory negative correlation between the outcomes of choice options.
    Marciano-Romm D; Romm A; Bourgeois-Gironde S; Deouell LY
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():324-38. PubMed ID: 26500191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomised prior feedback modulates neural signals of outcome monitoring.
    Mushtaq F; Wilkie RM; Mon-Williams MA; Schaefer A
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():868-879. PubMed ID: 26497268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is and what could have been: an ERP study on counterfactual comparisons.
    Osinsky R; Walter H; Hewig J
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):773-81. PubMed ID: 24749988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-dependent characteristics of feedback evaluation related to monetary gains and losses.
    Kardos Z; Tóth B; Boha R; File B; Molnár M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Dec; 122():42-49. PubMed ID: 27235583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elevated outcome-anticipation and outcome-evaluation ERPs associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.
    Pornpattananangkul N; Nadig A; Heidinger S; Walden K; Nusslock R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):625-641. PubMed ID: 28224457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feedback-related negativity reflects omission of monetary gains: Evidence from ERP gambling study.
    Yaple Z; Shestakova A; Klucharev V
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Nov; 686():145-149. PubMed ID: 30195974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociating absolute and relative reward- and punishment-related electrocortical processing: An event-related potential study.
    Wischnewski M; Schutter DJLG
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():13-19. PubMed ID: 29481828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity.
    De Pascalis V; Varriale V; D'Antuono L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 121(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 19900840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feedback-related negativity is enhanced in adolescence during a gambling task with and without probabilistic reinforcement learning.
    Martínez-Velázquez ES; Ramos-Loyo J; González-Garrido AA; Sequeira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Jan; 26(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 25494471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Feedback-related Negativity Codes Components of Abstract Inference during Reward-based Decision-making.
    Reiter AM; Koch SP; Schröger E; Hinrichs H; Heinze HJ; Deserno L; Schlagenhauf F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1127-38. PubMed ID: 27031567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EEG correlates of physical effort and reward processing during reinforcement learning.
    Palidis DJ; Gribble PL
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Aug; 124(2):610-622. PubMed ID: 32727262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.
    Liang J; Lin H; Xiang J; Wu H; Li X; Liang H; Zheng X
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 25586113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An electrophysiological monetary incentive delay (e-MID) task: a way to decompose the different components of neural response to positive and negative monetary reinforcement.
    Broyd SJ; Richards HJ; Helps SK; Chronaki G; Bamford S; Sonuga-Barke EJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Jul; 209(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 22659003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective preferences differentially modulate the processing of rewards gained by own vs. observed choices.
    Peterburs J; Sannemann L; Bellebaum C
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Sep; 132():107139. PubMed ID: 31295450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: An ERP study.
    Qi Y; Wu H; Raiha S; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():135-144. PubMed ID: 29501790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Woulda, coulda, shoulda: the evaluation and the impact of the alternative outcome.
    Gu R; Wu T; Jiang Y; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1354-60. PubMed ID: 21569049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.
    Leng Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():205-14. PubMed ID: 25218954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.
    Walsh MM; Anderson JR
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2012 Sep; 36(8):1870-84. PubMed ID: 22683741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.