These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29567108)

  • 21. The neural basis of feedback-guided behavioral adjustment.
    Sun S; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Sep; 736():135243. PubMed ID: 32726592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bringing in the negative reinforcements: the avoidance feedback-related negativity.
    Crowley MJ; Wu J; Bailey CA; Mayes LC
    Neuroreport; 2009 Nov; 20(17):1513-7. PubMed ID: 19829164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Context-sensitivity of the feedback-related negativity for zero-value feedback outcomes.
    Pfabigan DM; Seidel EM; Paul K; Grahl A; Sailer U; Lanzenberger R; Windischberger C; Lamm C
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():184-92. PubMed ID: 25541513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Behavioral approach and reward processing: results on feedback-related negativity and P3 component.
    Lange S; Leue A; Beauducel A
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):416-25. PubMed ID: 22178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trait anxiety and probabilistic learning: Behavioral and electrophysiological findings.
    Jiang D; Zhang D; Chen Y; He Z; Gao Q; Gu R; Xu P
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Feb; 132():17-26. PubMed ID: 29100909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. To believe or not to believe: trust choice modulates brain responses in outcome evaluation.
    Long Y; Jiang X; Zhou X
    Neuroscience; 2012 Jan; 200():50-8. PubMed ID: 22079574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stimulus valence influences the evaluative processing of action outcome.
    Ishii C; Katayama J
    Neuroreport; 2020 Aug; 31(11):840-844. PubMed ID: 32576774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Give it a second try? The influence of feedback and performance in the decision of reattempting.
    Chung WY; Darriba Á; Yeung N; Waszak F
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 248():105803. PubMed ID: 38703619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.
    Glazer JE; Kelley NJ; Pornpattananangkul N; Mittal VA; Nusslock R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):184-202. PubMed ID: 29454641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task.
    Krugliakova E; Klucharev V; Fedele T; Gorin A; Kuznetsova A; Shestakova A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 29196772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of feedback reliability on event-related potentials in an arrow flanker task.
    Jia M; Wang A; Sui L
    Neuroreport; 2023 Oct; 34(14):693-702. PubMed ID: 37556590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of outcome expectations in the generation of the feedback-related negativity.
    Bismark AW; Hajcak G; Whitworth NM; Allen JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Feb; 50(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 23153354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C; Polezzi D; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. When two become one: Electrocortical correlates of the integration of multiple action consequences.
    Osinsky R; Holst K; Ulrich N
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):252-261. PubMed ID: 29183792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Behavioural and neural limits in competitive decision making: The roles of outcome, opponency and observation.
    Dyson BJ; Steward BA; Meneghetti T; Forder L
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Jan; 149():107778. PubMed ID: 31593749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceptual Salience and Reward Both Influence Feedback-Related Neural Activity Arising from Choice.
    Lou B; Hsu WY; Sajda P
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(38):13064-75. PubMed ID: 26400937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Temporal prediction modulates the evaluative processing of "good" action feedback: An electrophysiological study.
    Kimura K; Kimura M; Iwaki S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Oct; 53(10):1552-9. PubMed ID: 27412662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cardiac cycle modulates reward feedback processing: An ERP study.
    Kimura K
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Oct; 711():134473. PubMed ID: 31479723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of self-construal type on outcome evaluation: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zhu X; Wu H; Yang S; Gu R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Feb; 112():64-69. PubMed ID: 28017638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Willingness valued more than ability in partner choice: Insights into behavioral and ERP data.
    Xu Q; Wang J; Li P
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Jul; 61(7):e14558. PubMed ID: 38459648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.