BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

560 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29567515)

  • 1. In-hospital complication rate following microendoscopic versus open lumbar laminectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Oichi T; Oshima Y; Chikuda H; Ohya J; Matsui H; Fushimi K; Tanaka S; Yasunaga H
    Spine J; 2018 Oct; 18(10):1815-1821. PubMed ID: 29567515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does the microendoscopic technique reduce mortality and major complications in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy? A propensity score-matched analysis using a nationwide administrative database.
    Ohya J; Oshima Y; Chikuda H; Oichi T; Matsui H; Fushimi K; Tanaka S; Yasunaga H
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Feb; 40(2):E5. PubMed ID: 26828886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Park SM; Park J; Jang HS; Heo YW; Han H; Kim HJ; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2020 Feb; 20(2):156-165. PubMed ID: 31542473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anterior Versus Posterior Approach for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Disease: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study of the MarketScan Database.
    Cole T; Veeravagu A; Zhang M; Azad TD; Desai A; Ratliff JK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1033-8. PubMed ID: 25768690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of infectious complications associated with blood transfusion in elective spinal surgery-a propensity score matched analysis.
    Kato S; Chikuda H; Ohya J; Oichi T; Matsui H; Fushimi K; Takeshita K; Tanaka S; Yasunaga H
    Spine J; 2016 Jan; 16(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 26499767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of age and comorbidities on complication rates and adverse outcomes after lumbar laminectomy in elderly patients.
    Li G; Patil CG; Lad SP; Ho C; Tian W; Boakye M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(11):1250-5. PubMed ID: 18469700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of incidental dural tears and their primary microendoscopic repairs on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing microendoscopic lumbar surgery.
    Soma K; Kato S; Oka H; Matsudaira K; Fukushima M; Oshina M; Koga H; Takano Y; Iwai H; Ganau M; Tanaka S; Inanami H; Oshima Y
    Spine J; 2019 Sep; 19(9):1559-1565. PubMed ID: 31009767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.
    Nerland US; Jakola AS; Solheim O; Weber C; Rao V; Lønne G; Solberg TK; Salvesen Ø; Carlsen SM; Nygaard ØP; Gulati S
    BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1603. PubMed ID: 25833966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between microendoscopic laminectomy and open posterior decompression surgery for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
    Ohtomo N; Nakamoto H; Miyahara J; Yoshida Y; Nakarai H; Tozawa K; Fukushima M; Kato S; Doi T; Taniguchi Y; Matsubayashi Y; Higashikawa A; Takeshita Y; Kawamura N; Inanami H; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Dec; 22(1):1053. PubMed ID: 34930238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study.
    Patil CG; Sarmiento JM; Ugiliweneza B; Mukherjee D; Nuño M; Liu JC; Walia S; Lad SP; Boakye M
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1484-92. PubMed ID: 24291409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complications after lumbar spine surgery between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.
    Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Hassanzadeh H; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 24573073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mortality and morbidity after spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: a retrospective matched-pair cohort study.
    Oichi T; Chikuda H; Ohya J; Ohtomo R; Morita K; Matsui H; Fushimi K; Tanaka S; Yasunaga H
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):531-537. PubMed ID: 27884743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outpatient elective posterior lumbar fusions appear to be safely considered for appropriately selected patients.
    Bovonratwet P; Ottesen TD; Gala RJ; Rubio DR; Ondeck NT; McLynn RP; Grauer JN
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1188-1196. PubMed ID: 29155341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Analysis of Microendoscopic and Open Laminectomy for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis at L1-L2 or L2-L3.
    Yamato Y; Nagata K; Kawamura N; Higashikawa A; Takeshita Y; Tozawa K; Fukushima M; Urayama D; Ono T; Hara N; Okamoto N; Azuma S; Iwai H; Sugita S; Yoshida Y; Hirai S; Masuda K; Jim Y; Ohtomo N; Nakamoto H; Kato S; Taniguchi Y; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():e408-e414. PubMed ID: 38143029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-hospital Course and Complications of Laminectomy Alone Versus Laminectomy Plus Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Analysis of 1804 Patients from the NSQIP Database.
    Badhiwala JH; Leung SN; Jiang F; Wilson JRF; Akbar MA; Nassiri F; Witiw CD; Wilson JR; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 May; 46(9):617-623. PubMed ID: 33290365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outpatient surgery reduces short-term complications in lumbar discectomy: an analysis of 4310 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database.
    Pugely AJ; Martin CT; Gao Y; Mendoza-Lattes SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 22814304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Phan K; Mobbs RJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E91-E100. PubMed ID: 26555839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hospital charges associated with "never events": comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and lumbar laminectomy to total joint arthroplasty.
    Daniels AH; Kawaguchi S; Contag AG; Rastegar F; Waagmeester G; Anderson PA; Arthur M; Hart RA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 26989978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.