These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29568766)

  • 1. Model Analysis of Digital Models in Moderate to Severe Crowding: In Vivo Validation and Clinical Application.
    Yoon JH; Yu HS; Choi Y; Choi TH; Choi SH; Cha JY
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8414605. PubMed ID: 29568766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index.
    Kau CH; Littlefield J; Rainy N; Nguyen JT; Creed B
    Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 20050733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
    Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and eligibility of Bonwill⁃Hawley arch form established by CBCT image for dental crowding measurement: a comparative study with the conventional brass wire and caliper methods.
    Wang XM; Meng WY; Wang WN; Huo YF; Xue H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3961-3972. PubMed ID: 37071219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
    Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
    Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of Bolton's Analysis among Different Malocclusion Patients Plaster Models and Digital Models Obtained by
    Jabri MA; Wu S; Zhang Y; Wang H; Pan Y; Ma J; Wang L
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Jul; 24(7):1086-1091. PubMed ID: 34290188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
    Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials.
    Torassian G; Kau CH; English JD; Powers J; Bussa HI; Marie Salas-Lopez A; Corbett JA
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):474-81. PubMed ID: 20482351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
    Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of Dental Monitoring 3D digital dental models using photograph and video mode.
    Morris RS; Hoye LN; Elnagar MH; Atsawasuwan P; Galang-Boquiren MT; Caplin J; Viana GC; Obrez A; Kusnoto B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):420-428. PubMed ID: 31474272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
    Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of 3-dimensional curvilinear measurements on digital models with intraoral scanners.
    Mack S; Bonilla T; English JD; Cozad B; Akyalcin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28863923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
    Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of accuracy of mesiodistal tooth measurements made in conventional study models and digital models obtained from intraoral scan and desktop scan of study models.
    Murugesan A; Sivakumar A
    J Orthod; 2020 Jun; 47(2):149-155. PubMed ID: 32195636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.