These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29569210)

  • 1. A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model.
    He D; Xu L; Qian W; Clarke J; Fan X
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 41(2):507-518. PubMed ID: 29569210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
    Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (II): Applications in spine diagnostics and assessment of crohn's disease.
    van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Kramer G; Pieters-van den Bos I; Marcus JT; Stoker J; Vos FM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1197-1204. PubMed ID: 29193469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
    Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R
    NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of region-of-interest-averaged and pixel-averaged analysis of DCE-MRI data based on simulations and pre-clinical experiments.
    He D; Zamora M; Oto A; Karczmar GS; Fan X
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):N445-N459. PubMed ID: 28786402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the patellar bone: How to quantify perfusion.
    Poot DHJ; van der Heijden RA; van Middelkoop M; Oei EHG; Klein S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Mar; 47(3):848-858. PubMed ID: 28707311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Operator dependency of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Kleppestø M; Bjørnerud A; Groote IR; Kim M; Vardal J; Larsson C
    MAGMA; 2022 Feb; 35(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 34213687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats.
    McGrath DM; Bradley DP; Tessier JL; Lacey T; Taylor CJ; Parker GJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2009 May; 61(5):1173-84. PubMed ID: 19253360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
    Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive population-averaged arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced vmagnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer.
    Onxley JD; Yoo DS; Muradyan N; MacFall JR; Brizel DM; Craciunescu OI
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jul; 89(3):658-65. PubMed ID: 24929169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a reference region and input function tail.
    Ahmed Z; Levesque IR
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Jan; 83(1):286-298. PubMed ID: 31393033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.
    Jia L; Wu X; Wan Q; Wan L; Jia W; Zhang N
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20200699. PubMed ID: 33332981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy.
    Ziayee F; Müller-Lutz A; Gross J; Quentin M; Ullrich T; Heusch P; Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 53():28-33. PubMed ID: 29902565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.
    Schabel MC; Fluckiger JU; DiBella EV
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4783-806. PubMed ID: 20679691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of contrast agent injection duration on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantification in prostate cancer.
    Klawer EME; van Houdt PJ; Pos FJ; Heijmink SWTPJ; van Osch MJP; van der Heide UA
    NMR Biomed; 2018 Sep; 31(9):e3946. PubMed ID: 29974981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge.
    Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
    Tomography; 2016 Mar; 2(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 27200418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semi-parametric arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in mice.
    Taxt T; Reed RK; Pavlin T; Rygh CB; Andersen E; Jiřík R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():10-20. PubMed ID: 29066294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge, Part II.
    Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Kinahan PE; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
    Tomography; 2019 Mar; 5(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 30854447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.