235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29569347)
1. First Year Medical Student Peer Nominations of Professionalism: A Methodological Detective Story about Making Sense of Non-Sense.
Mullikin TC; Shahi V; Grbic D; Pawlina W; Hafferty FW
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Jan; 12(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 29569347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A preliminary survey of professionalism teaching practices in anatomy education among Indian Medical Colleges.
Karunakaran I; Thirumalaikolundusubramanian P; Nalinakumari SD
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):433-443. PubMed ID: 28165673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "Safe Harbor": evaluation of a professionalism case discussion intervention for the gross anatomy course.
Spampinato CM; Wittich CM; Beckman TJ; Cha SS; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 24039220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using generalizability analysis to estimate parameters for anatomy assessments: A multi-institutional study.
Byram JN; Seifert MF; Brooks WS; Fraser-Cotlin L; Thorp LE; Williams JM; Wilson AB
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 27458988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical education.
Curran VR; Fairbridge NA; Deacon D
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Dec; 20(1):504. PubMed ID: 33308207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Anatomy Boot Camp on Students in a Medical Gross Anatomy Course.
Herling PJ; Mohseni BT; Hill DC; Chelf S; Rickert JA; Leo JT; Langley NR
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):215-223. PubMed ID: 27662606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceptions of first-year medical students towards learning anatomy using cadaveric specimens through peer teaching.
Agius A; Calleja N; Camenzuli C; Sultana R; Pullicino R; Zammit C; Calleja Agius J; Pomara C
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):346-357. PubMed ID: 29112798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy.
Wittich CM; Pawlina W; Drake RL; Szostek JH; Reed DA; Lachman N; McBride JM; Mandrekar JN; Beckman TJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 23212713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A psychometric evaluation of the anatomy learning experiences questionnaire and correlations with learning outcomes.
Choi-Lundberg DL; Williams AM; Zimitat C
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):514-527. PubMed ID: 28423232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical Students Learn Professionalism in Near-Peer Led, Discussion-Based Small Groups.
Cusimano MC; Ting DK; Kwong JL; Van Melle E; MacDonald SE; Cline C
Teach Learn Med; 2019; 31(3):307-318. PubMed ID: 30554529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A Novel Approach to Assessing Professionalism in Preclinical Medical Students Using Multisource Feedback Through Paired Self- and Peer Evaluations.
Emke AR; Cheng S; Chen L; Tian D; Dufault C
Teach Learn Med; 2017; 29(4):402-410. PubMed ID: 28498003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student professionalism.
Camp CL; Gregory JK; Lachman N; Chen LP; Juskewitch JE; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(2):64-72. PubMed ID: 20213851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longitudinal retention of anatomical knowledge in second-year medical students.
Doomernik DE; van Goor H; Kooloos JGM; Ten Broek RP
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):242-248. PubMed ID: 27706913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting Peer Nominations Among Medical Students: A Social Network Approach.
Michalec B; Grbic D; Veloski JJ; Cuddy MM; Hafferty FW
Acad Med; 2016 Jun; 91(6):847-52. PubMed ID: 26826072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing professionalism in early medical education: experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course.
Bryan RE; Krych AJ; Carmichael SW; Viggiano TR; Pawlina W
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2005 Sep; 34(8):486-91. PubMed ID: 16205826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What do medical students learn from dissection?
Flack NAMS; Nicholson HD
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):325-335. PubMed ID: 29205960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefits of extracurricular participation in dissection in a prosection-based medical anatomy program.
Whelan A; Leddy JJ; Ramnanan CJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 28881412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing Professionalism via Multisource Feedback in Team-Based Learning.
Emke AR; Cheng S; Dufault C; Cianciolo AT; Musick D; Richards B; Violato C
Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 26507992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer estimation of lack of professionalism correlates with low Conscientiousness Index scores.
Finn G; Sawdon M; Clipsham L; McLachlan J
Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):960-7. PubMed ID: 19769645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study.
Pais D; Casal D; Mascarenhas-Lemos L; Barata P; Moxham BJ; Goyri-O'Neill J
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 27483443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
